Oprano Front Page


Go Back   Oprano Adult Industry Forums > The Business Of Porn - Closed For Posting > Legacy Archived Main Board

Notices

Legacy Archived Main Board Business chat and general industry chat. All participation is welcome. Dont post your fucking spam here.





Check Out YnotMail

The Original Oprano Flat Board (Thanks To Sarettah!)---
Oprano Swag Shop
"History Of Porn Timeline
Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 06-24-2004   #1
Buff
Members
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Posts: 1,561
Default

So much for free speech

Quote:
WASHINGTON - A conservative group asked federal election officials on Thursday to investigate whether television ads for director Michael Moore's anti-Bush documentary "Fahrenheit 9/11" violate campaign finance law regulating when commercials may feature a presidential candidate.

The group Citizens United contended that commercials for "Fahrenheit 9/11" fall under federal campaign finance law. Regulations prohibit the use of corporate money to air ads identifying a presidential candidate in the 30 days before his party's nominating convention and the 60 days before the Nov. 2 election.
The worst part of this is that the law was challenged AND UPHELD by the Supreme Court, even though it is blatantly unconstitutional. I am not fan of Moore's, but this is an attack on all of our freedom. And now people are going to use the law to limit free speech.
__________________
Buff is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-24-2004   #2
Peaches
Members
Want to see your own Advertising Here!
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Hills of N. GA
Posts: 10,823
Default

Quote:
Originally posted by Buff@Jun 24 2004, 04:06 PM
So much for free speech

Quote:
WASHINGTON - A conservative group asked federal election officials on Thursday to investigate whether television ads for director Michael Moore's anti-Bush documentary "Fahrenheit 9/11" violate campaign finance law regulating when commercials may feature a presidential candidate.

The group Citizens United contended that commercials for "Fahrenheit 9/11" fall under federal campaign finance law. Regulations prohibit the use of corporate money to air ads identifying a presidential candidate in the 30 days before his party's nominating convention and the 60 days before the Nov. 2 election.
The worst part of this is that the law was challenged AND UPHELD by the Supreme Court, even though it is blatantly unconstitutional. I am not fan of Moore's, but this is an attack on all of our freedom. And now people are going to use the law to limit free speech.
Why don't they just take Bush's milliseconds he's on the screen in the ads out of the ads?

I may be dreaming this, but I swear this issue has been raised before in a similar situation with the same results....
__________________
Peaches@onlinebeach.com
ICQ# 36734533
Peaches is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-24-2004   #3
Buff
Members
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Posts: 1,561
Default

Quote:
Originally posted by Peaches+Jun 24 2004, 02:12 PM-->
QUOTE (Peaches @ Jun 24 2004, 02:12 PM)
__________________
Buff is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-24-2004   #4
Peaches
Members
Want to see your own Advertising Here!
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Hills of N. GA
Posts: 10,823
Default

Quote:
Originally posted by Buff@Jun 24 2004, 04:17 PM
Why should they? How about letting them exercise their right to free political speech as guaranteed in Amendment 1 to the Constitution of the United States?
So should everyone be allowed to run commercials with the candidates in them? Or are we going to pick and choose who this law applies to?

How about the laws regarding campaigning within a certain distance from the polls -just scrap those too?

Personally, I think it's a stupid law, but there are LOT of laws I think are stupid. However, until the laws are no longer in existence, I think everyone should have to follow them.

Nor do I think removing one or two frames from an advertisment constitutes a freedom of speech issue when a law prohibits certain advertising. There are many, many laws against advertising.
__________________
Peaches@onlinebeach.com
ICQ# 36734533
Peaches is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-24-2004   #5
grimm
Cramming 3 people in a Room to Attend Show
Stop Lurking and start posting! Register now!
 
grimm's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: New Orleans, LA
Posts: 5,306
Default

Quote:


Originally posted by Peaches+Jun 24 2004, 12:24 PM-->
QUOTE (Peaches @ Jun 24 2004, 12:24 PM)
__________________


Think horses, not zebras.
grimm is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-24-2004   #6
Buff
Members
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Posts: 1,561
Default

If someone wants to run a 4 day long ad bashing or supporting anyone in or running for office, it should be allowed.

Peaches, this law is not simply stupid or silly -- it's specifically prohibitted by the constitution. That doesn't mean anything to you?

Amendment I

Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the government for a redress of grievances.


Bah, forget it. It's the law, therefore we must obey it. Maybe slavery will be the law again someday.
__________________
Buff is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks
Thread Tools
Show Printable Version Show Printable Version
Email this Page Email this Page
Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 04:34 PM..


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright Evil Empire Inc. 2006-2022