Free speech shouldn't include violent porn

[Sexyteaser]

Originally Posted by gonzo

This is different from erotica, which is sexual material in which both parties involved in the sexual activity can be perceived by the viewer as being equal participants.

I have had a difficult time with some of the content and the balance with free speach as well. Being a woman there are some websites and material distributed online that is difficult to accept, but what I find acceptable someone else does or doesn't and it's not up to me. One example which I hate to even share is www.humantoiletbowls.com where in many of the videos the woman are degraded, now is this for real or for the camera? Were they ticked or in agreement? I don't know and I can see why some people would be horrified and want to blanketly target everything because of sites like this.

On another note with such easy access to this material by teens developing their sexuality and with a lack of open discussion with their parents on the subject matter I can see confusion about sex, intimacy and porn after having exposure to material even most of us agree is degrading and horrific.

What next we have girls beating eachother up to post the video online are we going to have a new generation of teen pornographers imitating the ultimate hole and human toilet bowls.. Free Speech is great but education is key and right now our Educators and Parents are still buying old books and playing 1970's sex education videos for their kids; These Educators definitely shouldn't be leading a anti-porn coalition if they have time on their hands.