![]() |
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
|||
|
|
|||||||
| Notices |
| Legacy Archived Main Board Business chat and general industry chat. All participation is welcome. Dont post your fucking spam here. |

![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
|
#1 |
|
Scored VIP to Anton's Piss Tank
Want to see your own Advertising Here!
Join Date: Oct 2002
Posts: 8,781
|
Found this article courtesy of http://www.allofem.com
Click link for full article. http://management.silicon.com/govern...9162544,00.htm Web smut labelling plan still on cards "This is not censorship" By Anne Broache Published: Tuesday 19 September 2006 The US Department of Justice has stepped up its defence of a proposal to imprison website operators who don't label pages containing sexually explicit material. The idea, outlined in an April speech by attorney general Alberto Gonzales, is approaching a vote in Congress. Even though there have been no hearings, the legislation has been attached to two separate measures - a massive communications bill and a bill to fund large portions of the federal government including the State Department - that are likely to be considered by the full Senate this autumn. The proposed restrictions are no different from requiring multipurpose stores such as 7-Eleven to shield pornographic magazines with so-called blinder racks, Larry Rothenberg, an attorney in the Justice Department's Office of Legal Policy, said at a panel discussion in Washington hosted by the Internet Caucus Advisory Committee on Friday. Rothenberg said: "We have what we consider to be a rather modest [proposal] to protect consumers. This is not censorship. It's not a major break with First Amendment principles." |
|
|
|

|
|
#2 |
|
Come get your medicine...
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Vancouver, Canada
Posts: 145
|
I don't think this proposed measure will be of much benefit in the end.
__________________
Maura Ingraham Director / Producer M Squared Productions ICQ: 292 824 444 maura l @ l masktv l dot l com |
|
|
|
![]() |
| Bookmarks |
|
|