Survey Time: Models in Boys Underwear

[Sabby]

Oh come on. I have some supergirl and bettyboop "boyshorts" I bought in the ladies lingerie section of walmart.

Boyshorts are much more popular and trendy than thongs are now.

And you can wear them around the house with just a tshirt.


Sabby

[Sabby]

These do look kinda girlie but they were bought in the ladies lingerie section of Walmart. And I'm 35 and obviously not teen content.


Sabby

[Jace]

Originally Posted by Sabby

Oh come on. I have some supergirl and bettyboop "boyshorts" I bought in the ladies lingerie section of walmart.

Boyshorts are much more popular and trendy than thongs are now.

And you can wear them around the house with just a tshirt.


Sabby

honey, they are talking about something different....boy shorts made for grown women is something COMPLETELY different than a producer handing a 22 year old woman a bag full of panties made for "kids 10-12" and wanting her to wear them

[Sabby]

Originally Posted by Jace

honey, they are talking about something different....boy shorts made for grown women is something COMPLETELY different than a producer handing a 22 year old woman a bag full of panties made for "kids 10-12" and wanting her to wear them

Yes but they probably arent going to look much different except the childs garments arent going to say "hottie" on them.

Why dont you just buy some plain woman's boyshorts or panties and print out a superhero iron on transfer and make them yourself? I think that would be an easy and ethical solution.


Sabby

[Jace]

Originally Posted by Sabby

Yes but they probably arent going to look much different except the childs garments arent going to say "hottie" on them.

Why dont you just buy some plain woman's boyshorts or panties and print out a superhero iron on transfer and make them yourself? I think that would be an easy and ethical solution.


Sabby

I will have to dig out some pics for you, cause they look WAY different

snug fitting sexy boy shorts for women look nothing like an 11 year olds panties...if they do, then you are not a good parent

[Hell Puppy]

Originally Posted by Sabby

These do look kinda girlie but they were bought in the ladies lingerie section of Walmart. And I'm 35 and obviously not teen content.


Sabby

The tummy pic gives me a tongue-on, does that make me a pedo?

Where'd Peaches go? We need a judgement. I must've been wrong about her being able to take it as well as she dishes it...

[gonzo]

Originally Posted by Hell Puppy

The tummy pic gives me a tongue-on, does that make me a pedo?

Where'd Peaches go? We need a judgement. I must've been wrong about her being able to take it as well as she dishes it...

I think shes having dinner with her good friend John Ip.

[Addie]

I'm quite fond of my little boy's Batman underwear though....

[JR]

i am confused. everyone got pissy pretty fast

dressing up "models" in boys underwear is disturbing... you should be fantasizing about whats under there... and hopefully not imagining a giant a big cock jumping out of her shorts.

but thats just me.

[gonzo]

Originally Posted by JR

i am confused. everyone got pissy pretty fast

dressing up "models" in boys underwear is disturbing... you should be fantasizing about whats under there... and hopefully not imagining a giant a big cock jumping out of her shorts.

but thats just me.

Its a costume. Plain and simple. No different than a boa or a leather G.

[Useless]

Originally Posted by Hell Puppy

So we get boys undies.

The idea here is skimpy boys briefs that are way too small, come out nice and tight on the model, a similarly themed t-shirt is way too short and just covers the breasts.

If I could stick my tongue in through the fly, I'm all for it.

We're talking boys' briefs here, right? So, it's not like you're trying to convince anyone that the rather large breasted chick in the picture is a young boy. I'm thinking it's going to take a shit load of duct tape to achieve that. And you certainly aren't trying to make her look like a |itt|e gir| - you are, after all, using boys' underwear. So, um...what am I missing here?

Would there be the same amount of objection if you were putting 20 year-old male models in girls' panties, with their big hairy balls hanging over the edges?

[Hell Puppy]

Originally Posted by Useless

If I could stick my tongue in through the fly, I'm all for it.

We're talking boys' briefs here, right? So, it's not like you're trying to convince anyone that the rather large breasted chick in the picture is a young boy. I'm thinking it's going to take a shit load of duct tape to achieve that. And you certainly aren't trying to make her look like a |itt|e gir| - you are, after all, using boys' underwear. So, um...what am I missing here?

Would there be the same amount of objection if you were putting 20 year-old male models in girls' panties, with their big hairy balls hanging over the edges?

Yup, exactly right.

But there seems to be a knee jerk reaction, at least from some parents, that anything that remotely reminds them of a child shouldn't be anywhere near porn.

To me there's a huge difference between being playful like a child and trying to pass someone off as a child to give the pedo's something to spank their meat to.

There are plenty of sites out there that do exactly that though, really go after the 18 year olds that could pass for 15-16 and do the whole pig tails and lollipop theme. I should check the Oprano sponsor list before I name names though....heh.

[Sabby]

Originally Posted by Jace

I will have to dig out some pics for you, cause they look WAY different

snug fitting sexy boy shorts for women look nothing like an 11 year olds panties...if they do, then you are not a good parent

I have all boys (15, 13, 11). They all wear boxers.

And they would be absolutely mortified if I made them wear "batman" panties.


Sabby

[gonzo]

Originally Posted by Hell Puppy

Yup, exactly right.

But there seems to be a knee jerk reaction, at least from some parents, that anything that remotely reminds them of a child shouldn't be anywhere near porn.

To me there's a huge difference between being playful like a child and trying to pass someone off as a child to give the pedo's something to spank their meat to.

There are plenty of sites out there that do exactly that though, really go after the 18 year olds that could pass for 15-16 and do the whole pig tails and lollipop theme. I should check the Oprano sponsor list before I name names though....heh.

Dont forget hiring models for 2K a month with the expectation of banging em out oh and dont forget you need to take these pills to shrink those boobs.

One way of raising "revenue" I would never consider.

[Jace]

a girl wearing little boys underwear to look cute is way different than a girl wearing 12 year GIRLS underwear to look younger

I was under the impression here we were talking about little girls underwear....I was mistaken

[Peaches]

Originally Posted by Hell Puppy

The tummy pic gives me a tongue-on, does that make me a pedo?

Where'd Peaches go? We need a judgement. I must've been wrong about her being able to take it as well as she dishes it...

Nope, just finally realized where this went. As I told you, I wanted notice - I got it.

BTW, you never once told me the model you were putting the little boy's underoos on was over 18. In fact, you constantly referred to her on SMS as 18. So, is she? Or were you putting them on the model that you showed the picture of, who is not 18?

I thought we had agreed to disagree. I don't think little children's clothing should be used on models who are months or a year over legal age. You turned that into me saying you were a pedo and stealing money when we all know you'd be tapping into my box of Todd Toys. Personally, I don't think a single person is going to join your site using "Batman Comics" as a search phrase.

I DO think putting someone barely legal in little children's clothing is not a line I would personally cross. Someone like the model you posted or Sabby are different. I already said that when I used Vanilla as an example on the playground. That's MY opinion. I gave it. I realized my mistake.

It's like I told someone I was dating who asked me if I loved him: "Don't ask the question if you're not ready for all the possible answers.".

[JR]

Originally Posted by gonzo

Its a costume. Plain and simple. No different than a boa or a leather G.

is dressing up like a 6yr old girl and taking sexually suggestive photographs "just a costume"? last i checked its absolutely, 100% illegal.

[gonzo]

Originally Posted by JR

is dressing up like a 6yr old girl and taking sexually suggestive photographs "just a costume"? last i checked its absolutely, 100% illegal.

I dont dress like a 6 year old. I dont have the figure for it...and I dont work with anyone under 18.

Youd have to ask one of the "teen" program owners.

[Peaches]

Originally Posted by JR

is dressing up like a 6yr old girl and taking sexually suggestive photographs "just a costume"? last i checked its absolutely, 100% illegal.

edit:

Oh wait, didn't read that right - I have no idea if it's legal or illegal. Not my side of the fence to worry about that. I said it was not something *I* consider right.

[JR]

Originally Posted by Peaches

Yep, it's legal. I already said that.

i am not going to look it up.... but i am 99.9% sure that intentionally making a model look under age and depicting her in graphic sexual shots is illegal. i remember reading up on the laws about this and remember the comments of someone once on netpond, claiming to be a police officer many years ago that completely broke it down (i believe it was right after one of the big busts in vancouver - with the underage girl on cam).

[Hell Puppy]

Originally Posted by JR

i am not going to look it up.... but i am 99.9% sure that intentionally making a model look under age and depicting her in graphic sexual shots is illegal. i remember reading up on the laws about this and remember the comments of someone once on netpond, claiming to be a police officer many years ago that completely broke it down (i believe it was right after one of the big busts in vancouver - with the underage girl on cam).

Yeah, that's my recollection as well. And whether it's legal or not, you're going after pedo's if you're intentionally trying to make the audience THINK she's under 18.

I have no idea what all the ins and outs are, maybe as long as you state all models are over 18 you're free and clear. I dont know, that's not a park I play in regardless of what Peaches thinks.

But there are some sites that clearly push the edge of that envelope. I checked the sponsor list, so I'll name a couple of names that aren't on the protected list....hehe. Recent example is Little April....she looks 15 and they appear to do everything they can to keep it that way. Another one that comes to mind that is independent is Kirsten of Kirsten's Room....she looks like a pudgy 16 year old....and has looked that way for what? 8 years or so now? She's gotta be pushing 30...hehe.

[spazlabz]

Like Gonzo said, it is a costume plain and simple. Does the website the girl is going to be on have a 2257 statement? do they state she is over 18 or do they hint that she is underage?
most sites, and I can only imagine that Hell Puppy would be very responsible when it comes to this, are not going to try and insinuate that a girl is underage. The girl may be young, shit 25 is young to me, but that doesn't make it illegal or immoral.

If you have a model with big boobs, you excentuate that feature..
nice ass.. same thing
girl has a gorgeous face, then lots of close ups
and if the girl is a teen and your selling youth (not molestation BTW, different things entirely) then you bring attention to that.
There is a reason the teen niche is arguably the biggest one out there, it is because the market likes to see young women naked and knocking boots


spaz

[Peaches]

I think this really needs to be settled the correct FFN way. Gonzo and Hellpuppy must put on the briefs in question, take a picture, post it, and let us decide if they look under than 18.

[gonzo]

Originally Posted by Peaches

I think this really needs to be settled the correct FFN way. Gonzo and Hellpuppy must put on the briefs in question, take a picture, post it, and let us decide if they look under than 18.

Id have to get them back from the model. And shes already stated that she is fond of them.

[spazlabz]

Originally Posted by Peaches

I think this really needs to be settled the correct FFN way. Gonzo and Hellpuppy must put on the briefs in question, take a picture, post it, and let us decide if they look under than 18.

GOOD GAWD WOMAN NO!!
you have gone insane LOL


spaz

[Peaches]

Originally Posted by gonzo

Id have to get them back from the model. And shes already stated that she is fond of them.

I will be more than happy to hit the local Walmart and buy duplicates

[Hell Puppy]

....like trying to get two bowling balls into a marble bag.