Joe didn't mention anything about that until later in the thread. Your reply was either directed at the article, or at Serge or Joe's posts (the only other replies in the thread before yours).
Serge: "looks like coinsedence to me... "
Joe: " Coincidence? ahaahahahahaaha! Yeah, right! I'm going to give away my email address to someone and see if it ends up being used by Osama Bin Laden."
Serge thinks it looks like coincidence. Joe disagrees.
You: "...and this changes the fact that a group of camel jockey's are responsible for killing him in what way? Fuckin' more liberal idiocy - blame everyone and everything cept the person(s) responsible. A philosophy of total irresponsibility, denial and excuses."
So where exactly did anyone suggest it changes anything about who was responsible? And where is the liberal idiocy. If you'd be so kind as to point it out for me.
|