Where are all the liberals?

Mike AI · 12-22-2003

I have loved the responses of Democrats....

Only Liberals could say that ousting 2 dictorial regimes in the middle east who supported terrorism and were our enemies, and now a 3rd coming clean - is considered a failure.

This has been a good week for US Foreign policy, and exerting muscle and strong determination.

It was not the UN, France, Germany, or any other weak wristed appeasers who brought this change about.

I am surprised that PD, and others have not posted that Bush cut a deal with Quadaffi to get US oil firms and Halliburton more contracts!!

PornoDoggy · 12-22-2003

Ghadafi "coming clean" probably does have something to do with the war in Iraq. However, both sides have been doing a diplomatic tapdance toward each other for a couple of years. So, claiming this as exclusively a "Bush" victory is like crediting Bush I for the fall of the Berlin Wall, while ignoring everything done between Truman and Reagan, and I know you wouldn't do that. (Ignore everyone from Truman to Carter, maybe, but never Reagan).

BTW, you should know by now that I don't use the "Bush is only doing this for oil and Haliburton" arguement. All that money for an education and no reading comprehension skills at all - your really ought to get your money back.

That kind of mushbrained thinking is for stupid people. The kind of people who jump on every piece of incidental evidence to support whatever notion they have decided is true.

DrGuile · 12-22-2003

Quote:

Originally posted by Mike AI@Dec 22 2003, 12:06 PM
I have loved the responses of Democrats....

Only Liberals could say that ousting 2 dictorial regimes in the middle east who supported terrorism and were our enemies, and now a 3rd coming clean - is considered a failure.

This has been a good week for US Foreign policy, and exerting muscle and strong determination.

It was not the UN, France, Germany, or any other weak wristed appeasers who brought this change about.

I am surprised that PD, and others have not posted that Bush cut a deal with Quadaffi to get US oil firms and Halliburton more contracts!!

Does that make you feel safer?

Do you think it reduced the chances of terrorists attacks against the USA?

Mike AI · 12-22-2003

Quote:

Originally posted by PornoDoggy@Dec 22 2003, 12:27 PM
Ghadafi "coming clean" probably does have something to do with the war in Iraq. However, both sides have been doing a diplomatic tapdance toward each other for a couple of years. So, claiming this as exclusively a "Bush" victory is like crediting Bush I for the fall of the Berlin Wall, while ignoring everything done between Truman and Reagan, and I know you wouldn't do that. (Ignore everyone from Truman to Carter, maybe, but never Reagan).

BTW, you should know by now that I don't use the "Bush is only doing this for oil and Haliburton" arguement. All that money for an education and no reading comprehension skills at all - your really ought to get your money back.

That kind of mushbrained thinking is for stupid people. The kind of people who jump on every piece of incidental evidence to support whatever notion they have decided is true.

Good to see the trend of liberals self destructing continues....

PornoDoggy · 12-22-2003

I missed that one completely, Mikey ... I'm not sure exactly how I "self destructed", but if it makes you feel better to think I've done so, go for it. BTW ... the "mushbrained thinking" paragraph wasn't very clear. It refers every bit as much to the idea that Bush only went to war over oil and enriching Haliburton as it does to the notion that something likely caused by a culmination of events - the war being just one of them - can be credited only to Bush.

If you bothered to read what I wrote, you'll notice that I started out by saying that Ghadafi's change in tone probably does have something to do with the war in Iraq. Years of sanctions undoubtedly were a factor as well.

Last edited by PornoDoggy at Dec 22 2003, 12:54 PM

Mike AI · 12-22-2003

Quote:

Originally posted by PornoDoggy@Dec 22 2003, 12:50 PM
I missed that one completely, Mikey ... I'm not sure exactly how I "self destructed", but if it makes you feel better to think I've done so, go for it. BTW ... the "mushbrained thinking" paragraph wasn't very clear. It refers every bit as much to the idea that Bush only went to war over oil and enriching Haliburton as it does to the notion that an event likely due to a culmination of events - the war being just one of them - can be credited only to Bush.

If you bothered to read what I wrote, you'll notice that I started out by saying that Ghadafi's change in tone probably does have something to do with the war in Iraq. Years of sanctions undoubtedly were a factor as well.

PD I did notice you gave Bush a little credit. No doubt Kadaffi has been coming around for sometime, however, I am sure he did not want to end up like Saddam so he is making the best deal he can.

We still have a long way to go in this war, but we have been making very solid steps forward!

JR · 12-22-2003

Quote:

« Previous Thread | Next Thread »

Originally posted by Mike AI+Dec 22 2003, 09:55 AM-->
QUOTE (Mike AI @ Dec 22 2003, 09:55 AM)

__________________

JR

View Public Profile

Visit JR's homepage!

Find More Posts by JR

12-22-2003 #8

Rolo

Members

Join Date: Dec 2002

Location: Six Feet Under

Posts: 2,150

By doing this, then Libya has also made sure that Israel will get more attention about their weapons programs in 2004... much more easy for them to point fingers at Israel, when they are "clean".

__________________
"Chaos is the law of nature, order is the dream of man."
~Henry B. Adams (Historian) 1838-1918

Rolo

View Public Profile

Send a private message to Rolo

Find More Posts by Rolo

Bookmarks

Google

Thread Tools

Show Printable Version

Email this Page

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads You may not post replies You may not post attachments You may not edit your posts BB code is On Smilies are On [IMG] code is On HTML code is On

All times are GMT -4. The time now is 07:47 PM..

12-22-2003	#1
Mike AI Administrator Want to see your own Advertising Here! Join Date: Oct 2002 Posts: 11,618	I have loved the responses of Democrats.... Only Liberals could say that ousting 2 dictorial regimes in the middle east who supported terrorism and were our enemies, and now a 3rd coming clean - is considered a failure. This has been a good week for US Foreign policy, and exerting muscle and strong determination. It was not the UN, France, Germany, or any other weak wristed appeasers who brought this change about. I am surprised that PD, and others have not posted that Bush cut a deal with Quadaffi to get US oil firms and Halliburton more contracts!! __________________ Make big money on your Domains! Why wait 40 days to get paid with the other guys? Parked.com pays the most for your traffic, and cuts checks twice a month!

12-22-2003	#2
PornoDoggy Cramming 3 people in a Room to Attend Show Want to see your own Advertising Here! Join Date: Oct 2002 Location: Amid the Cornfields of Illinois Posts: 5,366	Ghadafi "coming clean" probably does have something to do with the war in Iraq. However, both sides have been doing a diplomatic tapdance toward each other for a couple of years. So, claiming this as exclusively a "Bush" victory is like crediting Bush I for the fall of the Berlin Wall, while ignoring everything done between Truman and Reagan, and I know you wouldn't do that. (Ignore everyone from Truman to Carter, maybe, but never Reagan). BTW, you should know by now that I don't use the "Bush is only doing this for oil and Haliburton" arguement. All that money for an education and no reading comprehension skills at all - your really ought to get your money back. That kind of mushbrained thinking is for stupid people. The kind of people who jump on every piece of incidental evidence to support whatever notion they have decided is true. __________________ SEX STORY TEXT Exotic Material for Adult Websites Available for part time (project or ongoing) work ...

12-22-2003	#5
PornoDoggy Cramming 3 people in a Room to Attend Show Want to see your own Advertising Here! Join Date: Oct 2002 Location: Amid the Cornfields of Illinois Posts: 5,366	I missed that one completely, Mikey ... I'm not sure exactly how I "self destructed", but if it makes you feel better to think I've done so, go for it. BTW ... the "mushbrained thinking" paragraph wasn't very clear. It refers every bit as much to the idea that Bush only went to war over oil and enriching Haliburton as it does to the notion that something likely caused by a culmination of events - the war being just one of them - can be credited only to Bush. If you bothered to read what I wrote, you'll notice that I started out by saying that Ghadafi's change in tone probably does have something to do with the war in Iraq. Years of sanctions undoubtedly were a factor as well. Last edited by PornoDoggy at Dec 22 2003, 12:54 PM __________________ SEX STORY TEXT Exotic Material for Adult Websites Available for part time (project or ongoing) work ...