Paycom is frustrating the hell out of me.

[frustrated]

Originally Posted by Unregistered

Frustrated, I am sure Rand is assuming you were paid for those sales at some point of time... Meaining 3-4 pay periods ago you got $25 X 4 sales (or whatever) in check signups... they then paid you on them.

a month later (or however long) they come back NSF,etc... Of course they are going to take the $100 they gave you back ... This is the only way I can see what you are saying is happening .. So basically you are missing oput on the fact they already paid you for these signups in the past...

Well that's an interesting theory. I'm curious to hear Rand confirm if this is indeed the case. It seems what is happening is that they aren't paying on bad ACH joins, but merely negating the bad ones within the same pay period as the credit card transactions. In essence subtracting the ACH's from the CC's.

And that's what doesn't make sense to me. ACH's should only negate themselves, not all my other transactions.

[rand]

Originally Posted by frustrated

And that's what doesn't make sense to me. ACH's should only negate themselves, not all my other transactions.

Nope. Doesn't work that way.

Who's to say you'll have future ACH sales? Who's to say they won't be bad as well?


You get a payout from Epoch that includes all ACH and CC sales. We don't send you a separate payment for each payment method. Why would you expect us to absorb your bad sales in hopes that you might sometime in the future have good ones to make up for them? Money is money. The derivation of those funds doesn't matter. Yes, if you send your ACH transactions somewhere else you won't run into this, but if WTS has seen this thread they may not want your business based on your history. (Oh, but you're anonymous here, they won't know).