Legal Questions regarding 2257 and how it pertains to DirtyD

dirtysgoindown · 02-28-2010

Pornlaw, from my understanding, the drivers license used in this incident was from one of the model's friends with a picture that looked nothing like the model. Shouldn't this have been the first sign something was not kosher and he should pass on it?

According to the girl's statement, this "suitcase pimp" Eric from 305 Modeling (believed to have been Michael Chapin but not verified, knew she was under 18 and the actual sex that occurred itself is not illegal because the girl was emancipated through her legal marriage but her age was communicated to the accused parties and she was instructed to bring a fake ID and then told explicitly to copy the information on the ID to the model form. Reading between the lines, its easy to see the implication here.

If the picture on the drivers license used looks nothing like the model, does that make the case against him and his defense even worse?

02-28-2010	#12
dirtysgoindown Holding Catsup Head's Beer Join Date: Feb 2010 Posts: 46	Re: Legal Questions regarding 2257 and how it pertains to DirtyD Pornlaw, from my understanding, the drivers license used in this incident was from one of the model's friends with a picture that looked nothing like the model. Shouldn't this have been the first sign something was not kosher and he should pass on it? According to the girl's statement, this "suitcase pimp" Eric from 305 Modeling (believed to have been Michael Chapin but not verified, knew she was under 18 and the actual sex that occurred itself is not illegal because the girl was emancipated through her legal marriage but her age was communicated to the accused parties and she was instructed to bring a fake ID and then told explicitly to copy the information on the ID to the model form. Reading between the lines, its easy to see the implication here. If the picture on the drivers license used looks nothing like the model, does that make the case against him and his defense even worse?