![]() |
Legal Questions regarding 2257 and how it pertains to DirtyD
I have a couple of questions regarding 2257, minors, and movies.
In any photo shoot or movie shoot, you as the producer obtain photo ID from all of the actors in the shoot. If the face and body are mostly hidden from the camera during a shoot (as they would be in Dirty D's Glory Hole stuff, how is the 2257 ID tied to the actors? After all, it could be anyones penis sticking through. Here's another: In a movie or scene with 2 or more actors, wouldn't the 2257 or Proof of Age documentation be required to be presented (and maybe signed off on) from every actor, to every other actor. in a scene? If not, how would any actor know if his or her fellow actors are adults? |
Re: Legal Questions regarding 2257 and how it pertains to DirtyD
Quote:
|
Re: Legal Questions regarding 2257 and how it pertains to DirtyD
Quote:
Quote:
I expect Dirty Ds situation to grow worse and LE will probably be going through all of his docs looking for other underage performers. I would also expect them to call some of the ones that are borderline and even run some of the IDs to see if they are fake. It might even go as far as 2257 and the FBI but we will have to wait and see. In the Ray Guhn case in Florida, the DA added charges as the investigation continued. It could even impact the affiliates - just as it reached down to the distributors in the Traci Lord case. |
Re: Legal Questions regarding 2257 and how it pertains to DirtyD
Quote:
|
Re: Legal Questions regarding 2257 and how it pertains to DirtyD
We always run at least one "security cam" during a shoot. It's just an extra video camera static on a tripod stashed in the corner out of the way with a wide shot of the room and performance. That tape gets stored with the original raw footage and pics of the shoot including the 2257 docs. It also has the footage of the model presenting the ID and signing release.
If there's ever a question about exactly what happened or was said at a shoot, we've got it on tape. |
Re: Legal Questions regarding 2257 and how it pertains to DirtyD
Quote:
When you play fast and loose, doing things the outlaw way, sooner or later John Law will come knocking. |
Re: Legal Questions regarding 2257 and how it pertains to DirtyD
Quote:
This is one way www.2257Safe.com can really help. Its off site storage of your records that can be accessed by anyone anywhere with a password. If LE comes in and confiscates all records including 2257 records you will have to fight to get them back. And if you're arrested you will have a harder time than just getting them back. With a mere password you can give your lawyer access to the records so as to help defend you. Dirty D is in Spain and has no way to getting to his records and he even admitted they are probably already gone. You can have all the proof you want but once LE takes it, it is out of your control and if something is "lost" the burden remains on you to prove it existed. At least always have back up storage of everything off site and off your servers in case those are also confiscated. |
Re: Legal Questions regarding 2257 and how it pertains to DirtyD
We've been using a free server based script that works out very well.
The person that wrote it is long gone so if someone is interested in picking it up and rereleasing it I could zip up all the script files and send it to them. The admin http://cleos-porn-links.com/crap/2257admin.png Files on server http://cleos-porn-links.com/crap/2257files.png |
Re: Legal Questions regarding 2257 and how it pertains to DirtyD
Quote:
It reached the retailers. I was one of them at the time. |
Re: Legal Questions regarding 2257 and how it pertains to DirtyD
Quote:
Everything important exists in at least 2 physical locations. Never really thought so much about a LE seizure as the reason, but more so fire or natural disaster. |
Re: Legal Questions regarding 2257 and how it pertains to DirtyD
I know we are n the 2257 issue and I had asked a 2257 question in the Law forum, I hope that maybe it could get answered.
Thanks http://www.oprano.com/msgboard/showt...ewpost&t=94213 |
Re: Legal Questions regarding 2257 and how it pertains to DirtyD
Pornlaw, from my understanding, the drivers license used in this incident was from one of the model's friends with a picture that looked nothing like the model. Shouldn't this have been the first sign something was not kosher and he should pass on it?
According to the girl's statement, this "suitcase pimp" Eric from 305 Modeling (believed to have been Michael Chapin but not verified, knew she was under 18 and the actual sex that occurred itself is not illegal because the girl was emancipated through her legal marriage but her age was communicated to the accused parties and she was instructed to bring a fake ID and then told explicitly to copy the information on the ID to the model form. Reading between the lines, its easy to see the implication here. If the picture on the drivers license used looks nothing like the model, does that make the case against him and his defense even worse? |
Re: Legal Questions regarding 2257 and how it pertains to DirtyD
Without commenting on the facts of Dirty D's case since I dont really know what happened...
If the ID is fake and its a good fake, meaning that there is little way to tell and an expert would testify to that, the producer would have a solid defense. And that would apply to 2257 violations as well. If the pics donts match or the info doesnt match or the fake is just a cheap one that even a laymen shoud question it.. then I think the prosecutor will be able to meet their burden. Put yourself on the jury.... |
Re: Legal Questions regarding 2257 and how it pertains to DirtyD
Here's a quandary. I comply with 2257....in Canada. The FBI wants to visit my address. Good so far? They cross the border and now have less authority than I do. The Canadian government says it is illegal for me to give out his information to anyone except law enforcement, but they are not law enforcement. Pornlaw, as an American lawyer, what would you suggest they do?
|
Re: Legal Questions regarding 2257 and how it pertains to DirtyD
The FBI agent in charge of inspections indicated in 2007 that they wouldnt be leaving American soil to conduct inspections...
|
Re: Legal Questions regarding 2257 and how it pertains to DirtyD
Quote:
Don’t forget that I too was also involved as well in the bombing Pan Am Flight 103, the John F. Kennedy assassination and the disappearance of James Riddle "Jimmy" Hoffa. The key words are "believed but not verified"..... I strongly advise you to please verify your facts before you libel yourself on an open public forum. Thanks! :okthumb: |
Re: Legal Questions regarding 2257 and how it pertains to DirtyD
Quote:
|
| All times are GMT -4. The time now is 05:26 PM.. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright Evil Empire Inc. 2006-2022