Deecash and Secondary processing shave

[RawAlex]

I think an update is in order. At the Zoo, TMM / Nats people have pretty much washed their hands of it. They have indicated that this is a TOS issue with Deecash, and not any bug or failing of their software.

The deecash people are less than forthcoming, and their only comment is about sending out $500,000 in commissions in the last pay period. Make of that what you like.

[gonzo]

Originally Posted by RawAlex

I think an update is in order. At the Zoo, TMM / Nats people have pretty much washed their hands of it. They have indicated that this is a TOS issue with Deecash, and not any bug or failing of their software.

The deecash people are less than forthcoming, and their only comment is about sending out $500,000 in commissions in the last pay period. Make of that what you like.

Im getting old and my memory isnt as sharp as it was but didnt they sue Naked RHino for some sort of shave a few years ago?

[RawAlex]

Originally Posted by gonzo

Im getting old and my memory isnt as sharp as it was but didnt they sue Naked RHino for some sort of shave a few years ago?

Ahh, here is the rub: The answers that TMM John gave on this subject is that what Deecash is doing isn't a shave, because (are you ready) "It's in the affiliate program TOS". Apparently they don't see an issue with mobile traffic being filtered off, or with secondary processors not paying, etc. As long as it is in the TOS, it's not an issue as far as they are concerned, so it is not a NATS issue.