Oprano Front Page


Go Back   Oprano Adult Industry Forums > The Business Of Porn - Closed For Posting > Legacy Archived Main Board

Notices

Legacy Archived Main Board Business chat and general industry chat. All participation is welcome. Dont post your fucking spam here.





Check Out YnotMail

The Original Oprano Flat Board (Thanks To Sarettah!)---
Oprano Swag Shop
"History Of Porn Timeline
 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
Old 03-09-2010   #7
dirtysgoindown
Holding Catsup Head's Beer
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Posts: 46
Default Re: Heres How 2257 Should Be Addressed

Quote:
Originally Posted by Toby View Post
Regulations are only for those that want to follow the law. Those that willingly produce CP don't care about 2257.

Also, 2257 does nothing about models using fake or borrowed ID, which is rather ironic, since it was Traci Lords using fake ID that spurred this legislation to begin with.

To be clear, Dirty D's current legal problems are not about 2257. That case would remain even if 18 U.S.C. 2257 did not exist.
Toby agreed. BUT IF and that's a huge IF what Dirty D is claiming is actually true (I dont believe it is), my idea could have prevented it from occurring provided D followed the law. Plus my solution would have prevented D from shooting this girl as there would have been no cleared identification, for Kelsie or the girl's ID she used.
__________________


Don't get caught like Dirty D!!!
dirtysgoindown is offline   Reply With Quote
 

Bookmarks

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 09:42 AM..


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright Evil Empire Inc. 2006-2022