![]() |
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
|||
|
|
|||||||
| Notices |
| Legacy Archived Main Board Business chat and general industry chat. All participation is welcome. Dont post your fucking spam here. |

![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
|
|
|
#1 |
|
Brilliant Innoventionalist and writer.
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: USA, Northern Hemisphere, Terra, 3rd of nine, Sol System, Milky Way Galaxy, Far from Galactic Core
Posts: 2,260
|
The problem is not the content, it's monetizing the medium.
The old "newspaper" model doesn't seem to translate well to electronic content. It's not because the model's bad, it's because people don't value the Internet "ads" the same way they do print ads. (Which really is stupid)
__________________
![]() Eric J. White VirtualSexMachine.com |
|
|
|
|
|
#2 | |
|
Members
Want to see your own Advertising Here!
Join Date: Jul 2005
Posts: 6,165
|
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#3 | |
|
Brilliant Innoventionalist and writer.
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: USA, Northern Hemisphere, Terra, 3rd of nine, Sol System, Milky Way Galaxy, Far from Galactic Core
Posts: 2,260
|
Quote:
Like a web ad, unless it catches your eye, people "skip" right over them. Same thing. Advertising people just can "sell the sizzle" of the new medium yet. And newspaper editors seem to see the net as either an "expense," or some way to charge people for reading what is essentially a "free" medium for the consumer. Your 50 cent cover price on the paper has always been a "delivery" cost, and a way to qualify the subscriber as a serious reader. Because if he wasn't a serious reader, why would he pay a subscription? There is no parallel, or standardized accepted model for the web component.....yet.
__________________
![]() Eric J. White VirtualSexMachine.com |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#4 | |
|
Members
Want to see your own Advertising Here!
Join Date: Jul 2005
Posts: 6,165
|
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
![]() |
| Bookmarks |
| Tags |
| playboy |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|