Oprano Front Page


Go Back   Oprano Adult Industry Forums > The Business Of Porn - Closed For Posting > Legacy Archived Main Board

Notices

Legacy Archived Main Board Business chat and general industry chat. All participation is welcome. Dont post your fucking spam here.





Check Out YnotMail

The Original Oprano Flat Board (Thanks To Sarettah!)---
Oprano Swag Shop
"History Of Porn Timeline
Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 07-04-2009   #1
Toby
Fat Fucking Nobody
Respin bullshit press Your Comments Are Welcomed
 
Toby's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Houston
Posts: 2,624
Default Re: New 2257 Compliance Guide

There was a whole bunch more legal issues going on with regard to Francis. Tax evasion being the biggest one. It just wasn't all tied together in one nice tidy bundle.
Toby is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-04-2009   #2
RawAlex
Members
$100 for every ImLive sign-up
 
RawAlex's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Posts: 4,036
Default Re: New 2257 Compliance Guide

Quote:
Originally Posted by Toby View Post
There was a whole bunch more legal issues going on with regard to Francis. Tax evasion being the biggest one. It just wasn't all tied together in one nice tidy bundle.
Toby, I think you are right on the money here. Failure to maintain records was just a nice passing charge instead of "production of child pornography", which producing a movie with a 17 year old might have been considered. It let the government extract it's pound of flesh without having to brand Joe Francis directly. Plea bargain, I think - I am sure pornlaw will correct me if I am wrong here.
__________________
Let's go to the edge of disaster Push the pedal and go a little faster Let's slam into a wall at ramming speed Let's go to the edge of a mountain Jump off and lets start countin' Hit the ground and tell me if it bleeds
RawAlex is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-05-2009   #3
tony404
Members
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Posts: 926
Default Re: New 2257 Compliance Guide

Quote:
Originally Posted by RawAlex View Post
Toby, I think you are right on the money here. Failure to maintain records was just a nice passing charge instead of "production of child pornography", which producing a movie with a 17 year old might have been considered. It let the government extract it's pound of flesh without having to brand Joe Francis directly. Plea bargain, I think - I am sure pornlaw will correct me if I am wrong here.
You are right, no one has been arrested for a 2257 violation only and the persons were of age.
__________________
www.creamycandy.com yum yum.
tony404 is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 01:13 AM..


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright Evil Empire Inc. 2006-2022