Oprano Front Page


Go Back   Oprano Adult Industry Forums > The Business Of Porn - Closed For Posting > Legacy Archived Main Board

Notices

Legacy Archived Main Board Business chat and general industry chat. All participation is welcome. Dont post your fucking spam here.





Check Out YnotMail

The Original Oprano Flat Board (Thanks To Sarettah!)---
Oprano Swag Shop
"History Of Porn Timeline
Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 06-12-2009   #1
gonzo
Fat Fucking Nobody
Want to see your own Advertising Here!
 
gonzo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Atlanta,Ga.
Posts: 17,795
Blog Entries: 11
Default AIM Irresponsible? AIDS Rampant in Calif?

Interesting week out on the west coast.
Recap from my point of view is that AIM [the group that does testing for STDs in Calf.] did not publicize a recent performer testing positive for HIV.

Now I see this in Xbiz and I know for a fact that kayden Kross postponed her shoot on Weds after hearing this news. Dangerous time to be shooting porn in Calif again. Way to go Sharon Mitchell with your bogus doctorate! I see no value in this testing based on this...

*********
NEWS STORY
16 Previously Unpublicized Porn HIV Cases, L.A. County Health Says

LOS ANGELES — Los Angeles County Public Health officials released information Thursday that indicates that there have been 16 previously unpublicized cases of confirmed HIV cases of industry performers since the last outbreak in 2004.
The data released Thursday brings the number of known HIV cases in adult performers to 22 since 2004, including “Patient Zero,“ the actress who tested positive June 6.

Ten of those cases involved men who had sex with other men, according to health officials.

In all, 16 men and 6 women who worked as adult film industry performers contracted HIV between 2004 and 2008, the Health Department said. The county agency also said that between 1998 and 2003, there were 14 confirmed HIV cases among adult film performers.

It was not immediately clear whether the previously unpublicized HIV infections involved transmission of the virus on the set.

“Rumor is rampant when the words HIV and porn are in the same sentence; the media is like a moth to a flame,” AIM Healthcare cofounder Sharon Mitchell said. “We are finding that many clients, patients and companies are tempted to discuss this delicate matter with the world for whatever personal or professional gain.

"Fact is, that we are still awaiting final confirmation on the Patient Zero, who was given a positive result on Saturday, June 6.”

AIM administrator Brooke Hunter said Patient Zero is a "video performer."

AIM’s Dr. Colin Hamblin described the actress as having had two recent sexual partners, a fellow porn actor who worked with her on June 5 and her boyfriend, who is not in the porn industry. Those men have had sexual intercourse with an additional six people and all have been notified.

The performer's last negative test was April 29, according to AIM. She previously had been described as being in "a small number of films," which would explain the 36-day gap between tests.

There are two first-generation industry partners for Patient Zero.

One of her industry partners has tested "not detected" by a PCR/DNA test, most recently on June 8. He will retest on June 22, at the end of 14 days. His last negative test was May 13.

A second industry partner, in Las Vegas, tested "not detected" most recently on June 9. He worked with the infected woman on June 5. He will be retested on June 19, at the end of 14 days.

A second-generation exposure, the girlfriend of one of the industry partners, last tested negative on May 19 and will retest on June 19.

The last outbreak in 2004 involved an actor who had returned from working in Brazil spread the virus to three actresses who had performed with him. A transsexual performer unrelated to the other cases also tested positive.

XBIZ calls to AIM for comment late Thursday went unreturned.
__________________
We are putting the bastards of this world on notice; greed and corruption will always be met with "a voice made of ink and rage."
"Never try and be like anyone else" - Hunter S. Thompson
"The truth is the truth no matter how you try and package a lie" - Shellee Hale
gonzo is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-12-2009   #2
Toby
Fat Fucking Nobody
Respin bullshit press Your Comments Are Welcomed
 
Toby's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Houston
Posts: 2,624
Default Re: AIM Irresponsible? AIDS Rampant in Calif?

What is the law in Calif. in regard to reporting positive results to Public Health?
Toby is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-12-2009   #3
TheEnforcer
Scored VIP to Anton's Piss Tank
Want to see your own Advertising Here!
 
TheEnforcer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Posts: 8,781
Default Re: AIM Irresponsible? AIDS Rampant in Calif?

If there wasn't such a financial mess going on in California I have no doubt the state would come down hard on the industry. But, with the mess they have, likely not too much will be done I imagine.

Last edited by TheEnforcer; 06-18-2009 at 02:21 PM.
TheEnforcer is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-15-2009   #4
EmporerEJ
Brilliant Innoventionalist and writer.
 
EmporerEJ's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: USA, Northern Hemisphere, Terra, 3rd of nine, Sol System, Milky Way Galaxy, Far from Galactic Core
Posts: 2,260
Default Re: AIM Irresponsible? AIDS Rampant in Calif?

Lest we forget California must also follow Hipaa.
Not sure how it applies to this situation, but I'll bet it alters the reporting practice, even in California.
__________________

Eric J. White
VirtualSexMachine.com
EmporerEJ is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-15-2009   #5
RawAlex
Members
$100 for every ImLive sign-up
 
RawAlex's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Posts: 4,036
Default Re: AIM Irresponsible? AIDS Rampant in Calif?

The important quote in the whole story is:

"n all, 16 men and 6 women who worked as adult film industry performers contracted HIV between 2004 and 2008, the Health Department said"

2004 includes Lara Roxxx and all that crap. The vast majority of the male performers, if I understand correctly from various stories kicking around, includes most gay male performers doing bareback scenes.

Even with all the head counts, nobody has come close to find 6 female performers. Some have suggested that the 6 may have included "potential" new performers that AIM declined because they were already HIV positive.
__________________
Let's go to the edge of disaster Push the pedal and go a little faster Let's slam into a wall at ramming speed Let's go to the edge of a mountain Jump off and lets start countin' Hit the ground and tell me if it bleeds
RawAlex is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-17-2009   #6
miz_wright
Head CheeseMonger
 
miz_wright's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Posts: 1,069
Default Re: AIM Irresponsible? AIDS Rampant in Calif?

I'm pretty sure that AIM can't be all "SO AND SO HAS POSITIVE TEST!" 'cos it's illegal.

And, frankly, that's not the point of AIM as I understand it - the goal is to make sure that all performers have access to regular testing so when they show up at a shoot, they have the most current available tests to prevent an epidemic-level spread where possible.

Having said that, no tests are foolproof, and when one uses one's body as one's livelihood, there are levels of wear and tear one will expect - and part of that will be the fact that a performer can be carrying HIV without being positive on certain tests and a scene partner always has the potential to be at risk.
__________________
Sales Babe and General Nerd

Be different; get it Wright
Wright Stuff Consulting

Hit me on ICQ at 353902844 or email me at liz (at) wrightstuffconsulting (dot) com

Last edited by miz_wright; 06-17-2009 at 08:53 AM. Reason: typos are rad.
miz_wright is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-17-2009   #7
softball
Members
Want to see your own Advertising Here!
 
softball's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Posts: 6,165
Default Re: AIM Irresponsible? AIDS Rampant in Calif?

The real problem is you can be tested, walk out the door have unprotected sex, catch hiv and walk onto a set with clean test results.
softball is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-17-2009   #8
miz_wright
Head CheeseMonger
 
miz_wright's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Posts: 1,069
Default Re: AIM Irresponsible? AIDS Rampant in Calif?

Quote:
Originally Posted by rhetorical View Post
The real problem is you can be tested, walk out the door have unprotected sex, catch hiv and walk onto a set with clean test results.
Yeh, hence my comments about wear and tear and nothing being foolproof. It sucks, but no test is a guarantee.
__________________
Sales Babe and General Nerd

Be different; get it Wright
Wright Stuff Consulting

Hit me on ICQ at 353902844 or email me at liz (at) wrightstuffconsulting (dot) com
miz_wright is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-17-2009   #9
EmporerEJ
Brilliant Innoventionalist and writer.
 
EmporerEJ's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: USA, Northern Hemisphere, Terra, 3rd of nine, Sol System, Milky Way Galaxy, Far from Galactic Core
Posts: 2,260
Default Re: AIM Irresponsible? AIDS Rampant in Calif?

Quote:
Originally Posted by LizAEBN View Post
Yeh, hence my comments about wear and tear and nothing being foolproof. It sucks, but no test is a guarantee.
Exactly.
You can walk out the door, step off the curb, and get hit by a bus.
So, no jobs, or houses close to roads?

You work on a crab boat, fall over, and you're dead.

But here's the thing......what are the odds?
Can anyone point to ANY person who has died as a direct result of this "risky" behavior?

No. It's a risky job, but not the riskiest job, and certainly not near the top of the list.

I don't think we need a new law to require condoms.
It's just another way for the government, to try to get control of your balls.
I think we need a law requiring all fisherman to wear survival suits the entire time they are on deck. In fact, anyone going on a cruise.....they need to wear a survival suit all the time they are on the boat.
Now, how stupid does that sound?
__________________

Eric J. White
VirtualSexMachine.com
EmporerEJ is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-17-2009   #10
softball
Members
Want to see your own Advertising Here!
 
softball's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Posts: 6,165
Default Re: AIM Irresponsible? AIDS Rampant in Calif?

Quote:
I don't think we need a new law to require condoms.
It's just another way for the government, to try to get control of your balls.
your penis, actually

Last edited by softball; 06-17-2009 at 06:14 PM. Reason: ..
softball is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-18-2009   #11
EmporerEJ
Brilliant Innoventionalist and writer.
 
EmporerEJ's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: USA, Northern Hemisphere, Terra, 3rd of nine, Sol System, Milky Way Galaxy, Far from Galactic Core
Posts: 2,260
Default Re: AIM Irresponsible? AIDS Rampant in Calif?

Quote:
Originally Posted by rhetorical View Post
your penis, actually

No, I meant to say "Balls."
I was going for the literary effect there. That is, for the reader to imagine the "government" actually "grabbing" one's delicate "balls." As any real man knows, the balls, being a delicate organ, subject to swift discomfort at the lightest assault.
Now the Penis can "take a beating," (See what I did there, with the little Pun?) and some men might find that enjoyable.

But, if you want to be a Dick about it, (See there, another little pun?) My statement still makes more sense.
Since concern here is the contraction of AIDS from sexual intimacy, the balls would make it more risky. Casual contact with the skin, even the skin of the penis, has a lower incidence of infection than the exchange of seminal fluid/mucus membrane. No balls, no seminal fluid. MORE difficult for you, the Aids infected, "ball-less" man, (Or balls controlled by the government) to transmit the disease to vulnerable mucus membrane/vaginal membrane/anal lining, without said, seminal fluid.

But, as I said, I wasn't going for technical detail. I was going for a graphic literary effect.




__________________

Eric J. White
VirtualSexMachine.com
EmporerEJ is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-18-2009   #12
softball
Members
Want to see your own Advertising Here!
 
softball's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Posts: 6,165
Default Re: AIM Irresponsible? AIDS Rampant in Calif?

Quote:
Originally Posted by EmporerEJ View Post
No, I meant to say "Balls."
I was going for the literary effect there. That is, for the reader to imagine the "government" actually "grabbing" one's delicate "balls." As any real man knows, the balls, being a delicate organ, subject to swift discomfort at the lightest assault.
Now the Penis can "take a beating," (See what I did there, with the little Pun?) and some men might find that enjoyable.

But, if you want to be a Dick about it, (See there, another little pun?) My statement still makes more sense.
Since concern here is the contraction of AIDS from sexual intimacy, the balls would make it more risky. Casual contact with the skin, even the skin of the penis, has a lower incidence of infection than the exchange of seminal fluid/mucus membrane. No balls, no seminal fluid. MORE difficult for you, the Aids infected, "ball-less" man, (Or balls controlled by the government) to transmit the disease to vulnerable mucus membrane/vaginal membrane/anal lining, without said, seminal fluid.

But, as I said, I wasn't going for technical detail. I was going for a graphic literary effect.




and I was j/k.
softball is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-18-2009   #13
TheEnforcer
Scored VIP to Anton's Piss Tank
Want to see your own Advertising Here!
 
TheEnforcer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Posts: 8,781
Default Re: AIM Irresponsible? AIDS Rampant in Calif?

I'd still feel safer having sex with a pornstar who gets tested regularly than random women in a bar.
TheEnforcer is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-18-2009   #14
miz_wright
Head CheeseMonger
 
miz_wright's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Posts: 1,069
Default Re: AIM Irresponsible? AIDS Rampant in Calif?

Quote:
Originally Posted by TheEnforcer View Post
I'd still feel safer having sex with a pornstar who gets tested regularly than random women in a bar.
That's always been my argument when it's come up as a topic at the Zoo ("Would you fuck talent? Why or why not?"). It is always stunning to me how many are completely ok dating/ fucking strippers or barmaids, but not a fuckpro.
__________________
Sales Babe and General Nerd

Be different; get it Wright
Wright Stuff Consulting

Hit me on ICQ at 353902844 or email me at liz (at) wrightstuffconsulting (dot) com
miz_wright is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-18-2009   #15
softball
Members
Want to see your own Advertising Here!
 
softball's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Posts: 6,165
Default Re: AIM Irresponsible? AIDS Rampant in Calif?

Quote:
Originally Posted by LizAEBN View Post
That's always been my argument when it's come up as a topic at the Zoo ("Would you fuck talent? Why or why not?"). It is always stunning to me how many are completely ok dating/ fucking strippers or barmaids, but not a fuckpro.
Personally, I think in the real world, if you are fucking "real" heterosexual people you meet in "real" life...far far away from porn, strippers, etc. You are probably pretty safe. Those stats are really low.
I mostly stay away from productions that have real safety issues. The boys are usually boyfriends of the girls but mostly I do girl girl and single girl stuff.
Outside of that it is condoms. But most of the people I work with, I know and trust. It is the trust that is the biggest problem in the porn business. Honesty is no a commodity with a lot of currency in this game.

And I hate shooting boy girl stuff. Its time consuming, expensive and boring as stink.
softball is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-19-2009   #16
StrokeKing
Thinks Lars is a TOP NOTCH GUY
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: The Heartland
Posts: 37
Default Re: AIM Irresponsible? AIDS Rampant in Calif?

Sometimes I tend to believe that the primarily conservative-run media tends to blow these things out of proportion in an attempt to attribute any negative attention then can on the adult industry.

It's easy to get freaked out, but when you consider the thousands of performances in adult every month, it's a miracle it doesn't happen more often.
StrokeKing is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-19-2009   #17
miz_wright
Head CheeseMonger
 
miz_wright's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Posts: 1,069
Default Re: AIM Irresponsible? AIDS Rampant in Calif?

Quote:
Originally Posted by rhetorical View Post
Personally, I think in the real world, if you are fucking "real" heterosexual people you meet in "real" life...far far away from porn, strippers, etc. You are probably pretty safe. Those stats are really low.
I mostly stay away from productions that have real safety issues. The boys are usually boyfriends of the girls but mostly I do girl girl and single girl stuff.
Outside of that it is condoms. But most of the people I work with, I know and trust. It is the trust that is the biggest problem in the porn business. Honesty is no a commodity with a lot of currency in this game.

And I hate shooting boy girl stuff. Its time consuming, expensive and boring as stink.
I think I would disagree with the idea that away from porn and what not your risk levels drop. I mean, we have more than 22 cases of HIV/ AIDS in the country right now, which means that the majority of the transmission is happening outside. In that "real world" you speak of. Where stats are "low."

Actually, though, when I review the CDC's information out there for the last compiled year (2007*), new infection rates are about 16% of population in both white and black males and between 3 and 8% for white and black females. Scarier? Roughly 14% of the male populations between the ages of 14-29 are newly infected.

I think it's safe to say that I'd rather fuck a porn star.


* Source: CDC, Table 3, "Cases of HIV Infection and AIDS in the United States and Dependent Areas, 2007"
__________________
Sales Babe and General Nerd

Be different; get it Wright
Wright Stuff Consulting

Hit me on ICQ at 353902844 or email me at liz (at) wrightstuffconsulting (dot) com
miz_wright is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-19-2009   #18
softball
Members
Want to see your own Advertising Here!
 
softball's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Posts: 6,165
Default Re: AIM Irresponsible? AIDS Rampant in Calif?

I kinda have to think about where I live and work...
http://www.avert.org/canada-aids.htm

Here is the telling number (for me as a heterosexual male) last year in Canada there were 592 women reported having hiv and 45 having full blown aids. Now, how many of them were high risk crack hos, that I would probably stay away from in the first place...probably a lot.
Aids stats can be spun six ways to Sunday and I have seen it done. I still maintain in the real world, with a modicum of safety and good sense, it is still not a huge issue.

BTW, here is the same site with American stats....

http://www.avert.org/usa-statistics.htm
softball is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-19-2009   #19
TheEnforcer
Scored VIP to Anton's Piss Tank
Want to see your own Advertising Here!
 
TheEnforcer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Posts: 8,781
Default Re: AIM Irresponsible? AIDS Rampant in Calif?

Those bar call hook ups I used to do so often in my early 20's before I started dating my ex-wife and got married are much scarier than the idea of having sex with a regularly tested pornstar.

A lot of those women got around with FAR more partners than many porn stars and didn't get tested.
TheEnforcer is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-19-2009   #20
softball
Members
Want to see your own Advertising Here!
 
softball's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Posts: 6,165
Default Re: AIM Irresponsible? AIDS Rampant in Calif?

Quote:
Originally Posted by TheEnforcer View Post
Those bar call hook ups I used to do so often in my early 20's before I started dating my ex-wife and got married are much scarier than the idea of having sex with a regularly tested pornstar.

A lot of those women got around with FAR more partners than many porn stars and didn't get tested.
Ah yeah, they all look good at closing time. At midnight a six becomes a ten.
softball is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-19-2009   #21
DannyCox
I like cheese
 
DannyCox's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Montreal, QC, CA
Posts: 1,185
Default Re: AIM Irresponsible? AIDS Rampant in Calif?

Quote:
Originally Posted by rhetorical View Post
Ah yeah, they all look good at closing time. At midnight a six becomes a ten.
With enough Beers, a "one" can start looking like a 20!
DannyCox is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-19-2009   #22
softball
Members
Want to see your own Advertising Here!
 
softball's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Posts: 6,165
Default Re: AIM Irresponsible? AIDS Rampant in Calif?

Quote:
Originally Posted by DannyCox View Post
With enough Beers, a "one" can start looking like a 20!
I never went to bed with an ugly girl, but I have woken up with a few.
softball is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-19-2009   #23
DannyCox
I like cheese
 
DannyCox's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Montreal, QC, CA
Posts: 1,185
Default Re: AIM Irresponsible? AIDS Rampant in Calif?

Quote:
Originally Posted by rhetorical View Post
I never went to bed with an ugly girl, but I have woken up with a few.
oh, the embarrassing stories we all must have....
DannyCox is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-19-2009   #24
RawAlex
Members
$100 for every ImLive sign-up
 
RawAlex's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Posts: 4,036
Default Re: AIM Irresponsible? AIDS Rampant in Calif?

Quote:
Originally Posted by DannyCox View Post
With enough Beers, a "one" can start looking like a 20!
A four and a six pack is a ten.
__________________
Let's go to the edge of disaster Push the pedal and go a little faster Let's slam into a wall at ramming speed Let's go to the edge of a mountain Jump off and lets start countin' Hit the ground and tell me if it bleeds
RawAlex is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-19-2009   #25
TheEnforcer
Scored VIP to Anton's Piss Tank
Want to see your own Advertising Here!
 
TheEnforcer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Posts: 8,781
Default Re: AIM Irresponsible? AIDS Rampant in Calif?

Quote:
Originally Posted by DannyCox View Post
oh, the embarrassing stories we all must have....
I plead the fifth!!
TheEnforcer is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-12-2009   #26
Krissy4 Porn
Reading A Book on HTML
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Posts: 21
Default Re: AIM Irresponsible? AIDS Rampant in Calif?

So they figured this thing out yet?


or is everone Dead or MIA?
Krissy4 Porn is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 11:02 AM..


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright Evil Empire Inc. 2006-2022