![]() |
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
|||
|
|
|||||||
| Notices |
| Legacy Archived Main Board Business chat and general industry chat. All participation is welcome. Dont post your fucking spam here. |

| View Poll Results: Should Shellee Hale Be Protected Under Press Sheild? | |||
| Hell YES - Oprano IS the Wall Street Journal of Porn. |
|
8 | 80.00% |
| No -Blogs and Forums are not press. |
|
2 | 20.00% |
| Who cares? Im from GFY looking for more free drinks! |
|
0 | 0% |
| Voters: 10. You may not vote on this poll | |||
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
|
|
|
#1 |
|
Fat Fucking Nobody
Want to see your own Advertising Here!
Join Date: Oct 2002
Posts: 6,523
|
I would have to weigh intent.
If the intent is to provide the public with news and information, then I see no difference in the manner of publication or credentials of the writer. If the intent is other, especially self serving or intending only to damage someone, then it shouldn't be protected. |
|
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
Members
$100 for every ImLive sign-up
Join Date: Oct 2002
Posts: 4,036
|
if intent to damage was the standard, then Rush Limbaugh and the Drudge Report would both have been shut down a long time ago. The standard isn't intent, it hinges on the truth, or at least information from sources that say it is so.
__________________
Let's go to the edge of disaster Push the pedal and go a little faster Let's slam into a wall at ramming speed Let's go to the edge of a mountain Jump off and lets start countin' Hit the ground and tell me if it bleeds |
|
|
|
![]() |
| Bookmarks |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|