Oprano Front Page


Go Back   Oprano Adult Industry Forums > The Business Of Porn - Closed For Posting > Legacy Archived Main Board

Notices

Legacy Archived Main Board Business chat and general industry chat. All participation is welcome. Dont post your fucking spam here.





Check Out YnotMail

The Original Oprano Flat Board (Thanks To Sarettah!)---
Oprano Swag Shop
"History Of Porn Timeline
Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 07-10-2008   #1
RawAlex
Members
$100 for every ImLive sign-up
 
RawAlex's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Posts: 4,036
Default Re: AT&T and AOL block child porn newsgroups

It's like the first day sober... don't spank them for drinking yesterday, congratulate them for taking the step forward... the first one is the hardest.
__________________
Let's go to the edge of disaster Push the pedal and go a little faster Let's slam into a wall at ramming speed Let's go to the edge of a mountain Jump off and lets start countin' Hit the ground and tell me if it bleeds
RawAlex is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-10-2008   #2
Hell Puppy
Fat Fucking Nobody
Want to see your own Advertising Here!
 
Hell Puppy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Posts: 6,523
Default Re: AT&T and AOL block child porn newsgroups

It makes a good press release. It makes families feel perhaps safer about using their service.

That's about it.

Other than that, it's not really such a wise idea. They are a carrier. At the point a carrier starts censoring, then they are become not just a carrier but an editor. There was a case back in the early 90's where Compuserve did this that serves as a precedent. By censoring one thing, you are taking responsibility for your content. You've lost the immunity you have as merely a carrier.
Hell Puppy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-10-2008   #3
RawAlex
Members
$100 for every ImLive sign-up
 
RawAlex's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Posts: 4,036
Default Re: AT&T and AOL block child porn newsgroups

Quote:
Originally Posted by Hell Puppy View Post
It makes a good press release. It makes families feel perhaps safer about using their service.

That's about it.

Other than that, it's not really such a wise idea. They are a carrier. At the point a carrier starts censoring, then they are become not just a carrier but an editor. There was a case back in the early 90's where Compuserve did this that serves as a precedent. By censoring one thing, you are taking responsibility for your content. You've lost the immunity you have as merely a carrier.


They aren't censoring content per se, rather they are choosing not to carry and provide access to a service that is packed full of CP. They are not stopping people from getting that service from a third party (if it is available). It would be like saying that they no longer offer email, but you can get email service elsewhere. Censorship would involve inspecting all traffic and blocking certain material regardless of source.

I think that the ISPs are going the right way, and further, they are probably going to save a few dollars too by not buying this service or maintaining equipment to support it. Remember with the newsgroups, the ISPs were often actually hosting all the content (in replication with other ISPs), so in a sense they already were past the point of being innocent hosts anyway.
__________________
Let's go to the edge of disaster Push the pedal and go a little faster Let's slam into a wall at ramming speed Let's go to the edge of a mountain Jump off and lets start countin' Hit the ground and tell me if it bleeds
RawAlex is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Tags
aol, at&t, child porn

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 05:50 AM..


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright Evil Empire Inc. 2006-2022