Some serious Questions for Gonzo (Advertisers you may want to read this!)

[Hammer]

ummm... Toby I was referring to the sentence that obviously didn't need the word "written" to quality what kind of article it was. A series of books and articles would certainly be sufficient to make it clear she wasn't talking about an article of clothing.

[Toby]

Originally Posted by Hammer

ummm... Toby I was referring to the sentence that obviously didn't need the word "written" to quality what kind of article it was. A series of books and articles would certainly be sufficient to make it clear she wasn't talking about an article of clothing.

Yes, I understood what you were referring to, and your example is very clear to you and I when used in the course of conversation. But... how many times have you seen lawsuits hinge on the interpretation of such terms in a document.

While "written article" may be superfluous for general use, I have no issue with it in the given context.

[Sexyteaser]

Originally Posted by Hammer

ummm... Toby I was referring to the sentence that obviously didn't need the word "written" to quality what kind of article it was. A series of books and articles would certainly be sufficient to make it clear she wasn't talking about an article of clothing.

I did not write that it is how they have the form for that category worded... So, your beef is really with USPTO.

The USPTO did not have any issue with the use of "interenet porn" as they approved the filing of the trademark.

I guess i could have gotten more creative but there was not need to.

[EmporerEJ]

Originally Posted by Sexyteaser

The USPTO did not have any issue with the use of "interenet porn" as they approved the filing of the trademark.

I guess i could have gotten more creative but there was not need to.

Hmmm....well, I understand your comment. My concern would be more about if you ever had to deal with a challenge. But it's more likely you won't so it's a moot point.