Top Bucks Recent Injunction Compliance Mail

[Sexyteaser]

Original post about this from 3/2007 http://www.oprano.com/msgboard/showt...ing+affiliates

TUCSON, Ariz. — Cyberheat apparently has dodged maximum penalties over alleged Can-Spam violations after a federal judge ordered the Justice Department and the online adult company to hammer out an agreement.


In a case at U.S. District Court in Tucson, Cyberheat, which operates webmaster program TopBucks, is defending itself against charges by the Federal Trade Commission over sexually explicit spam messages sent by its affilates. It contends it can't control the actions of affiliates. If convicted, Cyberheat would be liable for $11,000 in civil penalties for each spam email, or $7.1 million. It would be the largest fine levied against an online adult company.

Rest of the story


The problem is that as a condition of the settlement Cyberheat had to shut down and Top Bucks can exist under intense scrutiny with a whole lot of conditions...

[Mediaguy]

No no no! Shellee read your own copy-pastes!! Read and PROCESS the information...

Originally Posted by Shelleehale

Original post about this from 3/2007 http://www.oprano.com/msgboard/showt...ing+affiliates

Why did you link to this? It's a repeat of this post but with no more info.

Originally Posted by Shelleehale

TUCSON, Ariz. — Cyberheat apparently has dodged maximum penalties over alleged Can-Spam violations after a federal judge ordered the Justice Department and the online adult company to hammer out an agreement.

In a case at U.S. District Court in Tucson, Cyberheat, which operates webmaster program TopBucks, is defending itself against charges by the Federal Trade Commission over sexually explicit spam messages sent by its affilates. It contends it can't control the actions of affiliates. If convicted, Cyberheat would be liable for $11,000 in civil penalties for each spam email, or $7.1 million. It would be the largest fine levied against an online adult company.

Rest of the story

In case someone is (again) misled by you posting this year-old pre-settlement version of this case, let me point out that there's NO REASON to post this now: it's out of date, irrelevant to reality, disregards the facts of the present and only reported the possible or theoretical outcome of the case before it ever hit the dockets.

Originally Posted by Shelleehale

The problem is that as a condition of the settlement Cyberheat had to shut down and Top Bucks can exist under intense scrutiny with a whole lot of conditions...

WHERE did you read that a condition of the settlement was that Cyberheat had to shut it's doors?

You didn't.

It's not shutting down. The settlement as it stands was supposedly "made possible by Cyberheat's planned departure from the business of owning and promoting websites".

Where did you read that TopBucks can "exist under intense scrutiny with a whole lot of conditions"?!?!?

The same conditions prevail as before (since everyone is "barred from future violations of the CAN-SPAM Act" anway lol) and supposedly Cyberheat/TopBucks will have to somehow monitor affiliates more closely.
That's about it. But since there's no way to prevent or know that an idiot will buy an email harvest and spam it before he actually does it, the "conditions" mean nothing but business as usual.

There's no other "lot of conditions" here.

Why spread manure where nothing will grow?

What's the point of trying to prey on people's fears?

There wasn't a positive peep out of you when Seth and SoulCash completely WON (did not settle, people, but outright WON) against the government and created an important precedent that was GOOD for the industry and fair to program owners.

Injecting inuendo and alarmist outcry to any piece of information that can be bent to the purpose, posting with the assumption that no one will read to the source, and spreading misinformation about other companies is no way to become an industry beacon.

Why do you only trumpet doom?

What are you selling?

.