Too Much Media vs. NR Media....

[Jace]

btw, since the suit is about defamation, what in the original post was false exactly?

[sarettah]

Originally Posted by Jace

btw, since the suit is about defamation, what in the original post was false exactly?

I don't know. I think they were stupid to go with defamation myself.

But, filing a stupid lawsuit does not make them dishonest.

Btw, early on in this thread, you say:

well, since chris and brandi already have the reputation they do, and with what they did in the past to others in this industry, I, personally, could never trust or believe anything they say or do

What past deeds are these that you are talking about?

[Jace]

Originally Posted by sarettah

What past deeds are these that you are talking about?

that will just have to come out in time, I am not going to throw accusations around when those deeds didn't happen to me first hand, but I have seen first hand 3-4 times what their actions have done to others, and it isn't pretty

[sarettah]

Originally Posted by Jace

that will just have to come out in time, I am not going to throw accusations around when those deeds didn't happen to me first hand, but I have seen first hand 3-4 times what their actions have done to others, and it isn't pretty

Casting dispersions. You seem to like to do that quite a bit, don't you?

If you aren't gonna back them up, don't voice em in the first place.

That is the way scumsuckers and lawyers deal.

[Sexyteaser]

These are the points in the case which brought me to ask the questions above for which Sarettah calls me an idiot.

179. A violation of the ITPA requires that the business restore any moneys or
property unlawfully acquired as a result of the breach to the Customer, and imposes a civil penalty of $10,000.00 for the first offense, and $20,000.00 for each subsequent offense.
N.J.S.A. § 56:8-163 et seq.

180. As hereinabove alleged, NATS system was defective and/or intentionally
designed to include Security Vulnerabilities.

181. As a result of such Security Vulnerabilities, upon information and belief,
NRM and each Class member’s computer servers have been invaded and the security of the Personal Information, as defined by the ITPA, contained on and/or transferred through such servers was breached.

182. Upon information an belief, that with respect to Affiliate Programs that
continue to use NATS, such breach is on-going.

183. As evidenced by the TMM Defendants December 2007 statement published on the GFY Board, the TMM Defendants are aware that the security of the Personal Information, as defined by the ITPA, contained on and/or transferred through the servers of NATS users was breached.

184. Upon information an belief, the TMM Defendants are aware that the security of the Personal Information maintained and/or transferred through the servers of Affiliate Programs that continue to use NATS, continues to be breached.

[sarettah]

Originally Posted by Shelleehale

[font=TimesNewRoman][left]These are the points in the case which brought me to ask the questions above for which Sarettah calls me an idiot.

No, I called you an idiot because you are an idiot.

The current conversation is pretty much Chris and Tracy's credibility versus Blake's credibility versus TMM's credibility and really has nothing to do with the legfal ramifications of the suit in regards to the rest of the adult industry.


Basically Jace is standing by Blake and Amy because they are friends (fair enough) but is the same time castinf dispersions on Chris and Tracy without backing them up.

That is where we are at at this point, have something to contribute? Go for it. Have nothing, then shut up.

Thanx in advance

[Jace]

Originally Posted by sarettah

Basically Jace is standing by Blake and Amy because they are friends (fair enough) but is the same time castinf dispersions on Chris and Tracy without backing them up.

fair enough, stay on the side where affilaites don't get paid.. and I'll stay on the side fighting for affilaites to get paid

[EmporerEJ]

This has become officially too complicated for me.
It has turned into a bad deal all around.
I had no idea it was this bad in the industry, and it makes me sad.

[gonzo]

Originally Posted by EmporerEJ

This has become officially too complicated for me.
It has turned into a bad deal all around.
I had no idea it was this bad in the industry, and it makes me sad.

Its been at the point where the lawyers will have to sort it out.

Discovery is going to be unreal on this. I think weve only just begun.

EJ its been this bad in this business for as long as I can remember. More people are just louder now and dont hide it.

As the scramble becomes tighter for the cash grab you will see more of it.
Ive already heard tales of self important program reps saber rattling with exclimations of "Do they know who they are fucking with?" at the forum.

Starbucks is a future ambitious goal for them.

[EmporerEJ]

Originally Posted by gonzo

Its been at the point where the lawyers will have to sort it out.

Discovery is going to be unreal on this. I think weve only just begun.

EJ its been this bad in this business for as long as I can remember. More people are just louder now and dont hide it.

As the scramble becomes tighter for the cash grab you will see more of it.
Ive already heard tales of self important program reps saber rattling with exclimations of "Do they know who they are fucking with?" at the forum.

Starbucks is a future ambitious goal for them.

It does them no good to fight to hold a share of the decreasing market with increasing competition. Reminds me of the buggy whip manufacturers from "other people's Money."

See "Proprietary interest" in another thread.

[gonzo]

Originally Posted by EmporerEJ

It does them no good to fight to hold a share of the decreasing market with increasing competition. Reminds me of the buggy whip manufacturers from "other people's Money."

See "Proprietary interest" in another thread.

IMHO if you want to watch how it will go. Observe how the studios are dealing with decreased DVD sales.

Same market... different verticle.

[EmporerEJ]

Originally Posted by gonzo

IMHO if you want to watch how it will go. Observe how the studios are dealing with decreased DVD sales.

Same market... different verticle.

Yes indeedy.....different delivery vehicle. That certainly sounds like a good idea!