Too Much Media vs. NR Media....

[Jace]

Originally Posted by sarettah

Yeah, he said that the lawsuit and deposition were not about the affiliates, and he was right. It is a defamation case, it is not a case of him suing on behalf of the affiliates or the affiliates suing.

So, for answering the question honestly, he doesn't care if he ever pays the affiliates eh?

You sure get more out of a paragraph then I do.

there is SO much more to that lawsuit than a defamation case and you know it

if you think the only outcome is going to be someone gets justice for some bad words they said, then you really need to go back and re-read what is really going on

[sarettah]

Originally Posted by Jace

there is SO much more to that lawsuit than a defamation case and you know it

if you think the only outcome is going to be someone gets justice for some bad words they said, then you really need to go back and re-read what is really going on

Perhaps, but the fact remains that NR is suing TMM over defamayion. Will there be lots of subresults, sure, Chris even indicates that an accounting is one of the things he hopes would come out of it even though he did not ask for it explicitly.

So, it is ok for you to understand that there is more to it than the surface but it is not ok for Chris to realize that. Because Chris did not make that a primary function of the lawsuit he must be not want that, eh?

[Jace]

Originally Posted by sarettah

So, it is ok for you to understand that there is more to it than the surface but it is not ok for Chris to realize that. Because Chris did not make that a primary function of the lawsuit he must be not want that, eh?

Anytime there's a problem with a sponsor program, the primary response for any responsible program owner is to make sure the affiliates link codes, payments are not compromised. Hell I get letter from sponsor programs when payments are late... and to think this has been going on for over a year and it's not their primary concern?

[Jace]

so back to your original question.. what is your personal stake in all this? "if he is on the side of the truth, then he should not be so one sided about it" which side are you on lol

[sarettah]

Originally Posted by Jace

so back to your original question.. what is your personal stake in all this? "if he is on the side of the truth, then he should not be so one sided about it" which side are you on lol

I am on neither side. I have read the deops, I have gone back and reviewed threads on GFY.

I find Chris and Tracy to be believeable. I find Blake to be less believable but not to the point of criminal and my opinion of Charles what's his face is quite low.

Haven't seen what Albright has to say beyond his posts. I find it very hard to believe that he did his postings to protect TMM or affiliates. He did his post (imho) because Chris told him to fuck off on the phone. He took what could have been resolved privately and threw it up on the boards and basically torpedoed someone elses's program over his own ego.

I don't think Chris and Tracy's non-solution to the problem is the best one but they are locked out of the program and can only get back in if they do it TMM's way which is bullshit.

[Jace]

Originally Posted by sarettah

He did his post (imho) because Chris told him to fuck off on the phone.

So that's how you respond when you have nothing to hide, rather then.. I'm on the road, lets chat when I get back...

[sarettah]

Originally Posted by Jace

So that's how you respond when you have nothing to hide, rather then.. I'm on the road, lets chat when I get back...

If the caller hits me wrong, hell yes. And you know that you would too.

If you had no knowledge of an issue and out of the blue someone calls and is nasty with you, are you friendly or pissed? Let's just say it's a bill collector. They call and say, hey, you owe $5000 on your visa, what you gonna do about it? But as far as you know, the visa has been paid on time, you gonna guarantee to be friendly with that guy? And fucking be honest about it.

[Jace]

Originally Posted by sarettah

I don't think Chris and Tracy's non-solution to the problem is the best one but they are locked out of the program and can only get back in if they do it TMM's way which is bullshit.

How many time has TMM offered to unlock admin for them to get that resolved. But instead they get a noticed from NRM not to contact them directly?

[sarettah]

Originally Posted by Jace

How many time has TMM offered to unlock admin for them to get that resolved. But instead they get a noticed from NRM not to contact them directly?

Once you get lawyers involved it all goes to hell, you know that. And the lawyers were involved as soon as Albright's post went up.

[sarettah]

Originally Posted by Jace

Anytime there's a problem with a sponsor program, the primary response for any responsible program owner is to make sure the affiliates link codes, payments are not compromised. Hell I get letter from sponsor programs when payments are late... and to think this has been going on for over a year and it's not their primary concern?

Most sponsor problems have not been revealed to the program through a phone call to the program owner while they are driving home from a show by someone like Albright telling them he is going to start crediting a bunch of people for a problem that the owner was for all intents and purposes not aware of.

[Jace]

Originally Posted by sarettah

Most sponsor problems have not been revealed to the program through a phone call to the program owner while they are driving home from a show by someone like Albright telling them he is going to start crediting a bunch of people for a problem that the owner was for all intents and purposes not aware of.

Really what program does he own? 'someone like Albright' meaning what? Did Albright say he was gonna start crediting bunch of people?.. wow didn't know you were in the conversation... so who's taking shit out of context now?

[sarettah]

Originally Posted by Jace

Really what program does he own? 'someone like Albright' meaning what? Did Albright say he was gonna start crediting bunch of people?.. wow didn't know you were in the conversation... so who's taking shit out of context now?

That is from the deposition, I think Chris's.

[Sexyteaser]

Do you think there is traceable revenue on the stolen email addresses from the security leak?

Do you think that we will find that traffic, spam, re-directs are found on a adult site owned or operated by a TMM owner/employee?

Is there a potential class action law suit by customers who's email addresses were compromised and were not informed of this theft as soon as TMM became aware of it?

How many customers had a increase of spam or malware after signing up under a site managed by TMM and is there some relevancy connecting the two?

There has been new legal complaints filed daily on spam and malware across the country; this case is in Federal Court I don't think the case will go under the radar and the exposure and answers to the above questions will get answered.

Anyone know who the John/Jane Does are?