Oprano Front Page


Go Back   Oprano Adult Industry Forums > The Business Of Porn - Closed For Posting > Legacy Archived Main Board

Notices

Legacy Archived Main Board Business chat and general industry chat. All participation is welcome. Dont post your fucking spam here.





Check Out YnotMail

The Original Oprano Flat Board (Thanks To Sarettah!)---
Oprano Swag Shop
"History Of Porn Timeline
Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 02-24-2008   #1
TheEnforcer
Scored VIP to Anton's Piss Tank
Want to see your own Advertising Here!
 
TheEnforcer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Posts: 8,781
Default Re: Vivid says no to porn

That lady Max brought with him to the last two Hollywood FL shows has some of the most amazing legs I have ever seen.
TheEnforcer is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-24-2008   #2
RawAlex
Members
$100 for every ImLive sign-up
 
RawAlex's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Posts: 4,036
Default Re: Vivid says no to porn

RTA isn't a tagging system as much as an attempt for the ASACP to interject itself into a political issue that just wasn't part of it's initial mandate. ASACP isn't suppose to be about keeping children from seeing porn, but rather keeping them from being IN porn. However, getting into the filter business is a slick way to try to get yourself into the political process, and Joan has never been shy about that, right or wrong.

Tagging is also pointless without support. All the tags in the world won't stop a single child from visiting an adult site if their parents don't take their responsibilities and set up their home PCs to use obey the tags.

It comes back to the basics of the problem, it isn't us, it's them.
__________________
Let's go to the edge of disaster Push the pedal and go a little faster Let's slam into a wall at ramming speed Let's go to the edge of a mountain Jump off and lets start countin' Hit the ground and tell me if it bleeds
RawAlex is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-24-2008   #3
tony404
Members
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Posts: 926
Default Re: Vivid says no to porn

Quote:
Originally Posted by RawAlex View Post
RTA isn't a tagging system as much as an attempt for the ASACP to interject itself into a political issue that just wasn't part of it's initial mandate. ASACP isn't suppose to be about keeping children from seeing porn, but rather keeping them from being IN porn. However, getting into the filter business is a slick way to try to get yourself into the political process, and Joan has never been shy about that, right or wrong.

Tagging is also pointless without support. All the tags in the world won't stop a single child from visiting an adult site if their parents don't take their responsibilities and set up their home PCs to use obey the tags.

It comes back to the basics of the problem, it isn't us, it's them.
if it was made universal not just in the us .You need a cc to look at any porn, that would solve the problem it wouldnt 100 percent but better then what we have now.
__________________
www.creamycandy.com yum yum.
tony404 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-24-2008   #4
RawAlex
Members
$100 for every ImLive sign-up
 
RawAlex's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Posts: 4,036
Default Re: Vivid says no to porn

Quote:
Originally Posted by tony404 View Post
if it was made universal not just in the us .You need a cc to look at any porn, that would solve the problem it wouldnt 100 percent but better then what we have now.

that one never works out because it is a denial of free speech rights. It just won't happen.

The concept is actually simple: Browsers should be shipped with the blocking activated, and the parent must dis activate the blocking if they so wish. Legally it would make it the computer owners problem at that point, not anyone elses.
__________________
Let's go to the edge of disaster Push the pedal and go a little faster Let's slam into a wall at ramming speed Let's go to the edge of a mountain Jump off and lets start countin' Hit the ground and tell me if it bleeds
RawAlex is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-25-2008   #5
TheEnforcer
Scored VIP to Anton's Piss Tank
Want to see your own Advertising Here!
 
TheEnforcer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Posts: 8,781
Default Re: Vivid says no to porn

Quote:
Originally Posted by RawAlex View Post
that one never works out because it is a denial of free speech rights. It just won't happen.

The concept is actually simple: Browsers should be shipped with the blocking activated, and the parent must dis activate the blocking if they so wish. Legally it would make it the computer owners problem at that point, not anyone elses.

No, that would not work becasue that would be an active mandatory denial by the government that people wuld have to take down. A better idea in my opinion would be to havethe end user ave to activate it. You could either do that where they have it on their computer and then have to "flip the switch" so to apeak to activate it or have a program that autolaunches the first time they connect to the net that allows to chose what setting they want.
TheEnforcer is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-25-2008   #6
EmporerEJ
Brilliant Innoventionalist and writer.
 
EmporerEJ's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: USA, Northern Hemisphere, Terra, 3rd of nine, Sol System, Milky Way Galaxy, Far from Galactic Core
Posts: 2,260
Default Re: Vivid says no to porn

Quote:
Originally Posted by TheEnforcer View Post
No, that would not work becasue that would be an active mandatory denial by the government that people wuld have to take down. A better idea in my opinion would be to havethe end user ave to activate it. You could either do that where they have it on their computer and then have to "flip the switch" so to apeak to activate it or have a program that autolaunches the first time they connect to the net that allows to chose what setting they want.
Nope, still nanny state mentality.
subsidize the blocking software, make it available for free, do whatever.
But you don't block free speech.
Anything less is unacceptable.
__________________

Eric J. White
VirtualSexMachine.com
EmporerEJ is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-25-2008   #7
TheEnforcer
Scored VIP to Anton's Piss Tank
Want to see your own Advertising Here!
 
TheEnforcer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Posts: 8,781
Default Re: Vivid says no to porn

Quote:
Originally Posted by EmporerEJ View Post
Nope, still nanny state mentality.
subsidize the blocking software, make it available for free, do whatever.
But you don't block free speech.
Anything less is unacceptable.
Oh boy. What a shock someone comes to the "I can do whatever I want" mentality and say they have zero responibility as a webmaster. Crap like that is why politicians and parents hate us.
TheEnforcer is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 08:04 AM..


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright Evil Empire Inc. 2006-2022