![]() |
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
|||
|
|
|||||||
| Notices |
| Legacy Archived Main Board Business chat and general industry chat. All participation is welcome. Dont post your fucking spam here. |

![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
|
|
|
#1 |
|
FFN PERSONAL TRAINER
$100 for every ImLive sign-up
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: N. Miami
Posts: 4,622
|
does anyone else find it a conflict that TMM now owns an affiliate software program a processing company AND several affiliate programs
Too Much info in one hands. Would YOU process thru a company that owns a competing affiliate program? Would you feel that your surfers reg info would be safe and secure? |
|
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
Members
$100 for every ImLive sign-up
Join Date: Oct 2002
Posts: 4,036
|
In the end, I think the worst part for TMM at this point is that they have moved themselves into a position of directly competiting with the companies they need to make their product valuable. Multiple billing options / layered processing doesn't work if you are only supported by one processor. NATS needs to have all of the processors possible on board and providing support to the NATS way of doing things, otherwise they quickly become Segpay's affiliate system only.
Mansions move to cut ties with Segpay is just the first in what I think may be a series of companies picking sides in a fight that is just a negative for the paysite owners. The net winner in all of this may end up being CCbill and their "new" affiliate system.
__________________
Let's go to the edge of disaster Push the pedal and go a little faster Let's slam into a wall at ramming speed Let's go to the edge of a mountain Jump off and lets start countin' Hit the ground and tell me if it bleeds |
|
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
Fat Fucking Nobody
Respin bullshit press Your Comments Are Welcomed
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Houston
Posts: 2,624
|
My thoughts exactly. If I were a user of NATS I'd be very uneasy about that.
__________________
My TGP's: Bevy Of Babes | Bevy Of Boobs | Babes In Boots | Well Heeled Women | Dressing For Sex | Latex Vixens | Stocking Vixens
|
|
|
|
|
|
#4 |
|
....
$100 for every ImLive sign-up
|
the shave feature in mpa was a HORRIBLE mistake, I agree, but I also think that Mansion has done a superb job in the past few years rectifying that mistake and taking steps to gain trust back
but this segpay / too much media shit is kind of weird for sure and I am not quite sure that I fully agree with the step TMM took |
|
|
|
|
|
#5 |
|
Fat Fucking Nobody
Want to see your own Advertising Here!
Join Date: Oct 2002
Posts: 6,523
|
IMO...
Your host, your software provider and your processor should all basically be like Switzerland. Lines are beginning to blur. It ultimately comes down to how ethically each is run. Take your host for instance. They may not own an affiliate program. But they have root access to all of your data. Wonder what a monthly dump of email addresses of people who have joined paysites across multiple programs' servers would be worth if discreetly marketed. You count on their ethics not to use it. Now I'm not sure what kind of proprietary technology mansion could possibly be doing with postbacks, but if that is the REAL concern here, then why not switch SEGpay to use a non-proprietary method instead of cutting it off completely? Shit flying everywhere with the software right now, I can see it's gonna be a busy Vegas trip for me. I'll make no decisions and not a lot of comments until after getting out there and talking to some folks face to face. |
|
|
|
![]() |
| Bookmarks |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|