Question for the lawyers - 2257 and nude "Art"

[RawAlex]

Originally Posted by pornlaw

As for 2257 purposes, I would highly doubt that the FBI is looking for dry humping websites to inspect.

If they inspected those companies at the rate that Agent Joyner discussed, 2 per week, it would take 26 years to complete just those 1200.

I would imagine that if any further inspections will be made they wont be soft core sites.

Michael

http://www.adultbizlaw.com

Actually, I think that the sites most likely to get inspected are those that play in the grey. Met-Art may be entirely legal, but they (and many others) specifically muddy the waters, not really mentioning the age of their models, playing up the "nude art" aspects, and otherwise attempting to appeal to people who may be looking for something less than legal. The only place they state the models are over 18 is in a small line on the 2257 page. Nowhere on the tour do they use "eighteen" or "nineteen", but they do use "teen nudes".

IMHO, the site panders to people looking for underage models. They may not have any underaged girls on their site, but their sales pitch is pure pander. As such, I would think they would be a very, very good target for a records inspection.