Oprano Front Page


Go Back   Oprano Adult Industry Forums > The Business Of Porn - Closed For Posting > Legacy Archived Main Board

Notices

Legacy Archived Main Board Business chat and general industry chat. All participation is welcome. Dont post your fucking spam here.





Check Out YnotMail

The Original Oprano Flat Board (Thanks To Sarettah!)---
Oprano Swag Shop
"History Of Porn Timeline
Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 10-31-2007   #1
EmporerEJ
Brilliant Innoventionalist and writer.
 
EmporerEJ's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: USA, Northern Hemisphere, Terra, 3rd of nine, Sol System, Milky Way Galaxy, Far from Galactic Core
Posts: 2,260
Default Re: Court asks if porn law covers mainstream films

Quote:
Originally Posted by helix View Post
Bonus points for you because you used the word "turgid" in a sentence.
Hey, I'm a PROfessional writer you know.
I'z gots all kinds o' big worders.
__________________

Eric J. White
VirtualSexMachine.com
EmporerEJ is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-01-2007   #2
Hammer
Master of My Domains
 
Hammer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Florida
Posts: 1,701
Default Re: Court asks if porn law covers mainstream films

Looking at turgid nipples often results in a turgid penis which is of course the definition of lascivious. The law says "lascivious displays of the genitals" or "actual or simulated sex" but I seriously doubt that any Hollywod scenes would be what most reasonable people would construe as simulated sex and I've never seen a Hollywood movie scene that showed a lascivious display of the genitals. In most cases, most of what you think you see is a response of your imagination.

Now, on the other hand, a photo of a chick about to put her mouth on a penis but not actually doing it or a photo of a guy with his penis about to enter a vagina but not actually entering, is pretty much going to be considered "simulated sex" by just about everyone.

So, comparing Hollywood sex to porn sex and hoping that the government is going to start applying 2257 to Hollywood and thinking that will lead to a public outcry of support for the porn industry is nothing more than wishful thinking.
__________________
Porn Site Pros - Custom Website Design, Turnkey Webcam and Pay Sites, SEO, and Consulting
Hammer is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-01-2007   #3
spazlabz
Payserve SUX
 
spazlabz's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2003
Posts: 1,988
Default Re: Court asks if porn law covers mainstream films

Quote:
Originally Posted by Hammer View Post
Looking at turgid nipples often results in a turgid penis which is of course the definition of lascivious. The law says "lascivious displays of the genitals" or "actual or simulated sex" but I seriously doubt that any Hollywod scenes would be what most reasonable people would construe as simulated sex and I've never seen a Hollywood movie scene that showed a lascivious display of the genitals. In most cases, most of what you think you see is a response of your imagination.

Now, on the other hand, a photo of a chick about to put her mouth on a penis but not actually doing it or a photo of a guy with his penis about to enter a vagina but not actually entering, is pretty much going to be considered "simulated sex" by just about everyone.

So, comparing Hollywood sex to porn sex and hoping that the government is going to start applying 2257 to Hollywood and thinking that will lead to a public outcry of support for the porn industry is nothing more than wishful thinking.
Isn't it Monster's Ball where Halley Berry gets stone cold bent over and fucked like crazy? Tits flying, moaning and groaning and being treated like a total slut thereby fulfilling at least a dozen of my feverish fantasies all at one time?

require a custodian of records for movies that have scenes like this is all I want

You put the exact same thing in a porn site, no cock visible, you think you could get away without having a 2257 statement and a CoR's page?

spaz
spazlabz is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-02-2007   #4
KevinG
Members
 
KevinG's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Ft. Lauderdale, FL, USA
Posts: 654
Default Re: Court asks if porn law covers mainstream films

Quote:
Originally Posted by spazlabz View Post
Isn't it Monster's Ball where Halley Berry gets stone cold bent over and fucked like crazy? Tits flying, moaning and groaning and being treated like a total slut thereby fulfilling at least a dozen of my feverish fantasies all at one time?
I need a clip of that ... and a box of tissues please.
__________________
I am available for Consulting, Design, Traffic, Marketing and SEO for adult and mainstream.
Contact: kevin@kevingodbee.com ICQ: 271-024-660
Web 3.0 Internet Consulting
KevinG is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-02-2007   #5
spazlabz
Payserve SUX
 
spazlabz's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2003
Posts: 1,988
Default Re: Court asks if porn law covers mainstream films

Quote:
Originally Posted by KevinG View Post
I need a clip of that ... and a box of tissues please.
heh heh... the most I will confess to when I watched the scene my freaking jaw dropped and..... nevermind LOL


spaz
spazlabz is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-03-2007   #6
Hammer
Master of My Domains
 
Hammer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Florida
Posts: 1,701
Default Re: Court asks if porn law covers mainstream films

Spaz, as soon as you can prove that the porn videos on your site have any artistic merit to them whatsoever, I'm sure you'll be afforded the same leeway that Hollywood is. Do you not see the difference between a Hollywood movie with sex scenes that further the story line and a porn video that has zero artistic or literary value?

Further, in Hollywood movies everyone knows that the guys dick is not actually in Halle Berry's pussy, yet in a simulated porn video, there's no way to know.

When Halle Berry has sex on screen it's acting. I don't care what you say, there isn't anything close to acting going on a porn video except for the chick's orgasm. And since in the vast majority of porn videos the chick actually is getting fucked, there is a point to requiring the producer to prove the model's age but why would anyone with half a brain require a producer to prove Halle Berry's age when everyone knows she wasn't actually having sex.
__________________
Porn Site Pros - Custom Website Design, Turnkey Webcam and Pay Sites, SEO, and Consulting
Hammer is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-05-2007   #7
masterbets
Trying to get enough posts to spam a link
I'm new!
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Posts: 1
Default Re: Court asks if porn law covers mainstream films

The gov needs to stop censoring shit. It is getting out of hand.
__________________
http://www.namedgirls.com
masterbets is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 03:14 PM..


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright Evil Empire Inc. 2006-2022