Court asks if porn law covers mainstream films

[helix]

Originally Posted by EmporerEJ

I wouldn't want to be mis-understood either.....but if you look deeply into the law, it would apply to that scene in the car on Titanic, as they "Implied" the act. And of course, her nipples were in a "turgid" state.

Ding ding ding! We have a winner......5 years in jail for you, sir.

Bonus points for you because you used the word "turgid" in a sentence.

[EmporerEJ]

Originally Posted by helix

Bonus points for you because you used the word "turgid" in a sentence.

Hey, I'm a PROfessional writer you know.
I'z gots all kinds o' big worders.

[Hammer]

Looking at turgid nipples often results in a turgid penis which is of course the definition of lascivious. The law says "lascivious displays of the genitals" or "actual or simulated sex" but I seriously doubt that any Hollywod scenes would be what most reasonable people would construe as simulated sex and I've never seen a Hollywood movie scene that showed a lascivious display of the genitals. In most cases, most of what you think you see is a response of your imagination.

Now, on the other hand, a photo of a chick about to put her mouth on a penis but not actually doing it or a photo of a guy with his penis about to enter a vagina but not actually entering, is pretty much going to be considered "simulated sex" by just about everyone.

So, comparing Hollywood sex to porn sex and hoping that the government is going to start applying 2257 to Hollywood and thinking that will lead to a public outcry of support for the porn industry is nothing more than wishful thinking.

[spazlabz]

Originally Posted by Hammer

Looking at turgid nipples often results in a turgid penis which is of course the definition of lascivious. The law says "lascivious displays of the genitals" or "actual or simulated sex" but I seriously doubt that any Hollywod scenes would be what most reasonable people would construe as simulated sex and I've never seen a Hollywood movie scene that showed a lascivious display of the genitals. In most cases, most of what you think you see is a response of your imagination.

Now, on the other hand, a photo of a chick about to put her mouth on a penis but not actually doing it or a photo of a guy with his penis about to enter a vagina but not actually entering, is pretty much going to be considered "simulated sex" by just about everyone.

So, comparing Hollywood sex to porn sex and hoping that the government is going to start applying 2257 to Hollywood and thinking that will lead to a public outcry of support for the porn industry is nothing more than wishful thinking.

Isn't it Monster's Ball where Halley Berry gets stone cold bent over and fucked like crazy? Tits flying, moaning and groaning and being treated like a total slut thereby fulfilling at least a dozen of my feverish fantasies all at one time?

require a custodian of records for movies that have scenes like this is all I want

You put the exact same thing in a porn site, no cock visible, you think you could get away without having a 2257 statement and a CoR's page?

spaz

[KevinG]

Originally Posted by spazlabz

Isn't it Monster's Ball where Halley Berry gets stone cold bent over and fucked like crazy? Tits flying, moaning and groaning and being treated like a total slut thereby fulfilling at least a dozen of my feverish fantasies all at one time?

I need a clip of that ... and a box of tissues please.

[spazlabz]

Originally Posted by KevinG

I need a clip of that ... and a box of tissues please.

heh heh... the most I will confess to when I watched the scene my freaking jaw dropped and..... nevermind LOL


spaz

[Hammer]

Spaz, as soon as you can prove that the porn videos on your site have any artistic merit to them whatsoever, I'm sure you'll be afforded the same leeway that Hollywood is. Do you not see the difference between a Hollywood movie with sex scenes that further the story line and a porn video that has zero artistic or literary value?

Further, in Hollywood movies everyone knows that the guys dick is not actually in Halle Berry's pussy, yet in a simulated porn video, there's no way to know.

When Halle Berry has sex on screen it's acting. I don't care what you say, there isn't anything close to acting going on a porn video except for the chick's orgasm. And since in the vast majority of porn videos the chick actually is getting fucked, there is a point to requiring the producer to prove the model's age but why would anyone with half a brain require a producer to prove Halle Berry's age when everyone knows she wasn't actually having sex.