Shit like this makes me happy I missed Internext

[mailman]

Originally Posted by Jace

I often wonder why Chris from xclusivecash never posts on boards, he obviously reads them ALL the time, because every post I make he tries to icq me

here is the latest:

(8/11/2007 5:29:00 PM) NR Media Chris: http://www.oprano.com/msgboard/showp...3&postcount=45 :-D You and StuartD are just maiking this all too easy ... please...by all means keep it up *THUMBS UP* In all sincerity... I appreciate it. And Hey if Tucker can't buy your Sig... can I?

At least Chris sends you an ICQ when I use to hit them up I would get no responce being I would go to Chris because TUCKER DID NOT OWN XCLUSIVE CASH and then chris would never respond and then mins later Tucker would hit me up..

all I know is that from when they stoped paying webmasters through nats forget the original issue that caused all this I am owed at least $4,500 and thats only till feb when I got sick of taking screen caps and they only pulled off nats a few months back.

[Jace]

Originally Posted by mailman

At least Chris sends you an ICQ when I use to hit them up I would get no responce being I would go to Chris because TUCKER DID NOT OWN XCLUSIVE CASH and then chris would never respond and then mins later Tucker would hit me up..

all I know is that from when they stoped paying webmasters through nats forget the original issue that caused all this I am owed at least $4,500 and thats only till feb when I got sick of taking screen caps and they only pulled off nats a few months back.

I just wonder what he means by "You and StuartD are just maiking this all too easy"

wonder if they are going to sue me??? ROFL

Chris!

[Hammer]

Originally Posted by Jace

I just wonder what he means by "You and StuartD are just maiking this all too easy"

wonder if they are going to sue me??? ROFL

Chris!

Might not be as funny as you think. Since you have no first-hand knowledge of anything you've said and have no way to prove any of it as fact, it might be best to stop talking.

[Jace]

Originally Posted by Hammer

Might not be as funny as you think. Since you have no first-hand knowledge of anything you've said and have no way to prove any of it as fact, it might be best to stop talking.

every post I make is of my opinion and all information is gathered from various posts by those on the inside and those speculating

I make sure and let people know that when I post

I have said it time and time again with every single post, the only thing I know for a fact is that affiliates of xclusivecash have still not been paid

[Hammer]

Originally Posted by Jace

every post I make is of my opinion and all information is gathered from various posts by those on the inside and those speculating

I make sure and let people know that when I post

I have said it time and time again with every single post, the only thing I know for a fact is that affiliates of xclusivecash have still not been paid

Do you know what libel and slander are? They are exactly what you just admitted to doing. You are saying things about a company that you don't know to be fact. If they can prove that the things you are saying is causing them financial loss and that what you said was not a fact, that is libel.

Just because you say you've only heard this from other people or read it on other boards doesn't protect you from a libel suit if what you are saying can't be proven as fact.

Let's say that I post on a board that company A stole from their affiliates, but I'm only repeating something I'd heard or read and have no first-hand knowledge or proof.

Suppose that I'm popular on that board and people listen to what I say so they start pulling their links and switching to another sponsor.

Suppose that company A can prove that I directly caused those affiliates to pull their links which then caused them to suffer a financial loss because some of those affiliates were generating substantial signups.

Suppose that company A knows they can prove that what I said was untrue because of some facts that I and the people I'd heard this stuff from weren't privy to?

Not only am I going to be slapped with a libel suit, but chances are very good that they will win because they will be able to prove all the elements of a libel suit.

1. My statements were false
2. My statements were made with the intent of causing ruin
3. My statements were made to more than one person

[Jace]

Originally Posted by Hammer

Let's say that I post on a board that company A stole from their affiliates, but I'm only repeating something I'd heard or read and have no first-hand knowledge or proof.

Suppose that I'm popular on that board and people listen to what I say so they start pulling their links and switching to another sponsor.

Suppose that company A can prove that I directly caused those affiliates to pull their links which then caused them to suffer a financial loss because some of those affiliates were generating substantial signups.

Suppose that company A knows they can prove that what I said was untrue because of some facts that I and the people I'd heard this stuff from weren't privy to?

Not only am I going to be slapped with a libel suit, but chances are very good that they will win because they will be able to prove all the elements of a libel suit.

1. My statements were false
2. My statements were made with the intent of causing ruin
3. My statements were made to more than one person

wow, so you are a lawyer now too? damn, your resume just keeps growing

[Hammer]

Originally Posted by Jace

wow, so you are a lawyer now too? damn, your resume just keeps growing

Does someone need to be a lawyer to understand the law and how not to break it?

[Rcourt64]

Originally Posted by Hammer

Do you know what libel and slander are? They are exactly what you just admitted to doing. You are saying things about a company that you don't know to be fact. If they can prove that the things you are saying is causing them financial loss and that what you said was not a fact, that is libel.

Just because you say you've only heard this from other people or read it on other boards doesn't protect you from a libel suit if what you are saying can't be proven as fact.

Let's say that I post on a board that company A stole from their affiliates, but I'm only repeating something I'd heard or read and have no first-hand knowledge or proof.

Suppose that I'm popular on that board and people listen to what I say so they start pulling their links and switching to another sponsor.

Suppose that company A can prove that I directly caused those affiliates to pull their links which then caused them to suffer a financial loss because some of those affiliates were generating substantial signups.

Suppose that company A knows they can prove that what I said was untrue because of some facts that I and the people I'd heard this stuff from weren't privy to?

Not only am I going to be slapped with a libel suit, but chances are very good that they will win because they will be able to prove all the elements of a libel suit.

1. My statements were false
2. My statements were made with the intent of causing ruin
3. My statements were made to more than one person

Do you know how hard it would be to prove most of that crap?
Subordination, Discrimination, Hear say, Speech Coalition Acts, and a few more...I can think of so many ways to rip this open Mighty One.