Is innovation in adult dead? And why?

[gonzo]

Mobile has already been unsucessfully tested as a major revenue stream for porn.

Phones are nothing more than a bitrate for VOD delivery.

[softball]

Originally Posted by gonzo

Mobile has already been unsucessfully tested as a major revenue stream for porn.

Phones are nothing more than a bitrate for VOD delivery.

I have never had much faith in mobile revenue. A lot of thunder and not much substance. Never say never, but not at the moment. I think the biggest technical innovation that has really effected the whole of internet marketing is Flash.

[Hammer]

It's easy to be innovative when you're new, but logically things slow down as time goes by.

In the beginning of the adult Internet there was nothing. You had BBS's and that was it. Then along came pay sites, and then picposts which evolved into TGPs and linklists. During that period it was easy to innovate because pretty much nothing had been done before. However, now that most of the stuff that people could think of off the top of their head has been done, we're left with what the forward thinkers can come up with and certainly that is going to happen at a much slower pace.

Is innovation dead? Hell no. Is it easy to come up with new and innovative ideas? Nope. But that's fine with me, because one day when I come up with something truly innovative, I'll be one of the few instead of one of the many.

[softball]

"Everything that can be invented has been invented."

--Charles H. Duell, Commissioner, U.S. Office of Patents, 1899.
So that's that then.

[Hammer]

Originally Posted by rhetorical

"Everything that can be invented has been invented."

--Charles H. Duell, Commissioner, U.S. Office of Patents, 1899.
So that's that then.

[Sexyteaser]

There is so much more that can be done and I think we should have an oprano round table and get to work!

[Jace]

morphing rss feeds for affiliate usage

INNOVATIVE AS FUCK

[Rcourt64]

Originally Posted by rhetorical

"Everything that can be invented has been invented."

--Charles H. Duell, Commissioner, U.S. Office of Patents, 1899.
So that's that then.

It's not about inventing anything sherlock shit head

I have an orange. I didn't invent it.

I have a strainer. I didn't invent that either


but I created this:


And I'm making millions with it.

It's not about inventing anything, it's cause you all sit inside the Internet Box and think your answers lay within. and they don't.

Why is it that when I speak to you rhetorical, I feel like I'm back in Kinder garden

[sarettah]

Originally Posted by Rcourt64

It's not about inventing anything sherlock shit head

I have an orange. I didn't invent it.

I have a strainer. I didn't invent that either


but I created this:


And I'm making millions with it.

It's not about inventing anything, it's cause you all sit inside the Internet Box and think your answers lay within. and they don't.

Why is it that when I speak to you rhetorical, I feel like I'm back in Kinder garden

Ah, here my Tampa friend I dsagree with you.

A creation is an invention.

An invention does not have to be totally new, it can be a recombining of exisitng things in a new way that produces a new product.

In your example with the Orange and a strainer you have not invented a new product, after all Orange Juice has been around since the first Orange. However, you have created a new method for getting at the Orange Juice, no longer do I have to peel the Orange and get rid of the crap to get at the juice, now it can be packaged in a glass, a bottle or any other type of container. So while the parts you used were not new and in reality the product produced was not new the combination of the parts to produce the product (Orange Juice without the Orange) is new. The methodology you used is the invention.

[JoesHO]

Originally Posted by sarettah

Ah, here my Tampa friend I dsagree with you.

A creation is an invention.

An invention does not have to be totally new, it can be a recombining of exisitng things in a new way that produces a new product.

In your example with the Orange and a strainer you have not invented a new product, after all Orange Juice has been around since the first Orange. However, you have created a new method for getting at the Orange Juice, no longer do I have to peel the Orange and get rid of the crap to get at the juice, now it can be packaged in a glass, a bottle or any other type of container. So while the parts you used were not new and in reality the product produced was not new the combination of the parts to produce the product (Orange Juice without the Orange) is new. The methodology you used is the invention.

it is a service offred, he gets the juice and sllls the juice, nothing inovative at all.

he fills a need . supply and demand simple economics 101 . he finds a demand for oj and gives them oj.

[softball]

Originally Posted by sarettah

Ah, here my Tampa friend I dsagree with you.

A creation is an invention.

An invention does not have to be totally new, it can be a recombining of exisitng things in a new way that produces a new product.

In your example with the Orange and a strainer you have not invented a new product, after all Orange Juice has been around since the first Orange. However, you have created a new method for getting at the Orange Juice, no longer do I have to peel the Orange and get rid of the crap to get at the juice, now it can be packaged in a glass, a bottle or any other type of container. So while the parts you used were not new and in reality the product produced was not new the combination of the parts to produce the product (Orange Juice without the Orange) is new. The methodology you used is the invention.

There are a lot of inventions to getting orange juice into the box and onto your table....not the least of which is the box...the materials created and the processes to make the box. The hundreds of patents to make sure the juice is safe to drink. The thousands of patents involved in growing the oranges in sufficient quantity to produce juice at a commercial level. The hundreds of thousands of patents involved in constructing the roads and manufacturing the cars and metal to transport the juice. Hell, all inventions rely on previous invention. I wonder what the first invention was. It would surely be the only pure invention. I guess Rcourt never got out of kinder garden because he can't even spell it. BTW, that is the great thing about adult. You can be a moron and still make a living. It is kind of an equal opportunity industry. Of that we should be proud.