![]() |
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
|||
|
|
|||||||
| Notices |
| Legacy Archived Main Board Business chat and general industry chat. All participation is welcome. Dont post your fucking spam here. |

![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
|
|
|
#1 | |
|
Filling Bishop's Pond
Respin bullshit press Your Comments Are Welcomed
Join Date: Feb 2006
Posts: 2,942
|
Quote:
I see them attempting to use this case to set an example to embed fear into future webmasters and sponsors in this industry ![]() and most of you fuckers are just gonna sit back and watch? aint yas? |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
Members
Join Date: Dec 2003
Posts: 497
|
Unless there's more to the charges than meets the eye, his lawyers can beat it.
They could push for a prostitution conviction which they can. That's about all of it. The racketeering charges? Depends on the extent of his interests, connections and attitude. If he's an asshole, and there's no crime being an asshole, he can expect some fines and probation. The fact the prosecutors are moving around the case is an indication of 'malice' to a degree. If I was his attorney I'd bring that up immediately and ask for the charges to be dismissed or civil charges will be filed. He only needs 51% in a civil case. The prosecutors are after this guy for reasons we don't know about. Something he's been doing or perhaps someone whose been harmed and blame responsibility on this dude. Either way they're going dangerously, dangerously outside of their authority to convict another citizen. That's a Constitutional issue that requires immediate attention by the bench. We've seen recently the immeasurable damage done by overzealous prosecutors in the Duke rape case. That prosecutor Nifong, fucked up dozens of people's lives and placed his community in economic distress the likes we've not seen in years. Those falsely accused are suing for damages inflicted as their civil rights were violated to the worst degree. Entire families and friendships were destroyed by irresponsible prosecution. If this guy being accused is a scumbag whose been circumventing the law to do harm, then more power to the prosecutors but they should nail him on something that merits it. Not 'ideals' and 'philosophies'. |
|
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
Bone Thug Wannabee
Join Date: Jul 2006
Posts: 11
|
I thought id give a bit more information on the 3 other people arrested in this case
William Beach aka Old man, was a male actor on our site Jane Dreka aka Sandra, was a female actress on our site Tom Dwyer provided his house for shoot locations All 3 now charged with racketeering, wonder how the other actors and actresses now feel about shooting content. |
|
|
|
|
|
#4 |
|
Master of My Domains
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Florida
Posts: 1,701
|
I don't know how much you know about the case Greg, but it's hardly the slam dunk you think it is. I agree that the racketeering charges are ludicrous, but when you pay a bunch of girls to have sex with guys that you don't pay, it's pretty hard to call that anything but prostitution and since prostitution in Florida is illegal, they better hope Larry Walters is really worth his lofty price tag.
__________________
Porn Site Pros - Custom Website Design, Turnkey Webcam and Pay Sites, SEO, and Consulting |
|
|
|
|
|
#5 | |
|
Members
Want to see your own Advertising Here!
Join Date: Jul 2005
Posts: 6,165
|
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#6 | |
|
Fat Fucking Nobody
Respin bullshit press Your Comments Are Welcomed
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Houston
Posts: 2,624
|
Quote:
__________________
My TGP's: Bevy Of Babes | Bevy Of Boobs | Babes In Boots | Well Heeled Women | Dressing For Sex | Latex Vixens | Stocking Vixens
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#7 | |
|
Members
Want to see your own Advertising Here!
Join Date: Jul 2005
Posts: 6,165
|
Quote:
I always give industry people the benefit of the doubt. Which I did in their case right from the get go. It was like pulling teeth for anyone to make the statement Jim did and it took months. He seems to have been caught up in a whirlwind created by a bunch of guys who partied till they dropped and made no provision for the consequences. When I asked Walters after he posted on some board somewhere about this very thing he did not reply. He did however make his case and as such I felt should have answered the question. Jim is pleading legal strategy for his silence. But you can't have it both ways. It was the continued dodging of this question that aroused my suspicion. I certainly don't support paying girls to party then claiming it is a porn business issue. If these parties are bogus confections of an overzealous prosecutor, then we owe them full support. If not, then I am iffy about the whole thing. BTW, this is not all based on what I have read. I have heard a few stories along the way before this bust. |
|
|
|
|
![]() |
| Bookmarks |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|