Legal Hassles for one of our own

[pam]

I believe he paid $8k for cam shows, in advance, from what I've read.

Originally Posted by Hammer

Some guy claimed he paid $8000 for access to the site? WTF?

I guess I'm missing it, but what were they charged with?

[Hammer]

Originally Posted by pam

I believe he paid $8k for cam shows, in advance, from what I've read.

What a moron.

Were they producing the porn while their kids were in the house? Seems like it would be hard not to with 4 of them and if they were, I think they deserve a lot more than some hassles over zoning.

[spazlabz]

Originally Posted by Hammer

What a moron.

Were they producing the porn while their kids were in the house? Seems like it would be hard not to with 4 of them and if they were, I think they deserve a lot more than some hassles over zoning.

Hey Hammer.. good to see you back man, its been too long.

You are wrong, that is like saying that I cannot have sex with my wife in our own home unless the kids are off visiting other people and not in the house.

A cam show is sex with a webcam running, lots of amateur flicks out there with a couple having sex in their own bedroom with a camcorder set up. I am sure that when they did these cam shows their children were not holding the camera. I can't say for sure what happened in their house but I would strongly suspect that their kids never even knew what Mommy and Daddy did. The ones who caused any damage to these kids are the police who acted like they were busting a meth lab instead of someone running a business out of their home.

of course that just my opinion


spaz

[UncutBucksMike]

Originally Posted by Hammer

What a moron.

Were they producing the porn while their kids were in the house? Seems like it would be hard not to with 4 of them and if they were, I think they deserve a lot more than some hassles over zoning.

I love when people jump to conclusions, in the absence of facts. We did NOT produce content with the kids in the house. If you feel this strongly, you might want to move to Ft Mitchell. Did we have sex while the kids were in the house, YES, maybe we should be run out for that as well! Hell, we had four kids, so there must have been sex occurring, let's just shoot em for that.
Just to clarify a bit, one of the main reasons we did the site was so that we could be home with the kids and not dump them in daycare. We could produce content while they were at school or visiting relatives.

Mike

[Hammer]

Originally Posted by UncutBucksMike

I love when people jump to conclusions, in the absence of facts.

Did you see me jump to a conclusion? I asked a question. If I was jumping to a conclusion I wouldn't have started by saying, "Were they producing the porn while their kids were in the house?"

And in case you thought otherwise, when I said, "What a moron", I was referring to the moron that paid 8 grand in advance for cam shows.

Thanks for the welcome back Spaz, but I disagree. There's a big difference between me having sex with my wife quietly in our room while our kids are asleep and someone producing sex videos or cam shows, especially if they're bringing in other people.

Of course, that's just my opinion too.

If they were indeed shooting while their kids were in school or other places, then I have no problem with that. Then again, we all know there are places where it's legal to produce porn and other than south Florida, where it's sort of overlooked, the only place where it's technically legal, is L.A. county California. Shooting porn elsewhere is a risky business and not just because of zoning laws. When you shoot in a house where children live, then you're just asking for trouble.

[Forest]

Originally Posted by Hammer

Thanks for the welcome back Spaz, but I disagree. There's a big difference between me having sex with my wife quietly in our room while our kids are asleep and someone producing sex videos or cam shows, especially if they're bringing in other people.

There is a HUGE difference

[gonzo]

Originally Posted by Forest

There is a HUGE difference

This plays kind of into the Jim Manley case as well. Which I am sure Hammer knows about as well as I do.

As an aside I heve neer shot or even worked on an adult website when there were children in this house. But I can see how soeone could use that to the local police to make someone s life a living hell.

[Forest]

Originally Posted by gonzo

This plays kind of into the Jim Manley case as well. Which I am sure Hammer knows about as well as I do.

As an aside I heve neer shot or even worked on an adult website when there were children in this house. But I can see how soeone could use that to the local police to make someone s life a living hell.

Its not just about doing it while the children are in the house. In the laws eyes running an adult enterprise from a home where there are children present at any time is not a good idea. And in this case it seems to be a zonning issue. I know for a fact that zoning becomes an issue when running a LIVE operation from a home. Running paysites is one thing but doing live shows and or filming sexual acts in a non zoned area while get u in trouble.

2cents

[spazlabz]

Originally Posted by Hammer

Thanks for the welcome back Spaz, but I disagree. There's a big difference between me having sex with my wife quietly in our room while our kids are asleep and someone producing sex videos or cam shows, especially if they're bringing in other people.

Of course, that's just my opinion too.

Yup, that's what makes these forums we like so much work.. people having differing opinion and in Oprano's case we can disagree without screaming and name calling and no one ends up in the corner sucking their thumbs heh heh


spaz

[gonzo]

Originally Posted by spazlabz

Yup, that's what makes these forums we like so much work.. people having differing opinion and in Oprano's case we can disagree without screaming and name calling and no one ends up in the corner sucking their thumbs heh heh


spaz

Hell I disagree with Hammer a lot oveer th years. Doesnt stop us from being firends. I prefer to call it debate. And this is a hot topic.

You have to admire Mike and Jen's persistance to stay in this business.
I know I do.

[Forest]

ya know running a porn biz from a home where children are is not like selling mary kay shit out of your house.

we are held to a different standard due the the nature of our content and I have to say I agree with some of it

In today's porn world if u cant afford a 500 a month office to do your work in and u have children get ready to have some major issues.

[Hammer]

Originally Posted by gonzo

Hell I disagree with Hammer a lot oveer th years. Doesnt stop us from being firends.

A lot?

I disagree.