![]() |
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
|||
|
|
|||||||
| Notices |
| Legacy Archived Main Board Business chat and general industry chat. All participation is welcome. Dont post your fucking spam here. |

![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
|
|
|
#1 |
|
Fat Fucking Nobody
Want to see your own Advertising Here!
Join Date: Oct 2002
Posts: 6,523
|
Took a quick look across my sites I'm running something like this:
MSIE: 66.57% Firefox: 26.9% Safari: 3.08% Opera: 1.49% Everyone else is fighting for scraps. Firefox slowly pecking away at it. Not sure they'll ever get the majority though because most people just aren't tech savvy enough to bother swapping out what comes with the OS. The lesson in there is your true newbie dumb ass surfers are your MSIE surfers....that means they're also the easiest to convert with adult. Firefox users are more savvy. |
|
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
Right HERE . . . BITCH!
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Chronic Town
Posts: 1,295
|
I've been using FF for well over a year. When I build free sites and such, I always make sure they look just as good in FF as they would in IE.
__________________
True Beauty Cash For High Quality Erotica | Certified Hosting Is Da Fucking Bomb "Don't Get None On Ya" |
|
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
Fat Fucking Nobody
Want to see your own Advertising Here!
Join Date: Oct 2002
Posts: 6,523
|
Yup, good code should look right in both Firefox and MSIE.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#4 | |
|
Filling Bishop's Pond
Respin bullshit press Your Comments Are Welcomed
Join Date: Feb 2006
Posts: 2,942
|
Quote:
I truly do not find a medium between the two, finding myself having to decide which one I'm going to stay with on publication, and which one I'm willing to sacrifice and leave looking crappy. I presume I'd go with the one I receive more hits from. Internet Explorer or Mozilla? Yahoo or Google? Chocolate or Vanilla? Missionary or Doggy? Waffle House or Denny's? These are the dilemma of a Surfmaster I need an Internet melting pot here
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#5 |
|
Fat Fucking Nobody
Want to see your own Advertising Here!
Join Date: Oct 2002
Posts: 6,523
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#6 |
|
Right HERE . . . BITCH!
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Chronic Town
Posts: 1,295
|
Mozilla
Vanilla Doggy Waffle House
__________________
True Beauty Cash For High Quality Erotica | Certified Hosting Is Da Fucking Bomb "Don't Get None On Ya" |
|
|
|
|
|
#7 |
|
Fat Fucking Nobody
Want to see your own Advertising Here!
|
I sometimes forget about cross browser compatability.
Pages looking well in IE as well as Netscape used to be the major concern. Sounds like there are still more issues that some of us forget. Does anyone know of some handy code like there used to be with Java script to ensure your pages look good in major browsers?
__________________
We are putting the bastards of this world on notice; greed and corruption will always be met with "a voice made of ink and rage." "Never try and be like anyone else" - Hunter S. Thompson "The truth is the truth no matter how you try and package a lie" - Shellee Hale
|
|
|
|
|
|
#8 |
|
Stay Out Of The Box
Want to see your own Advertising Here!
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Lost in the ozone
Posts: 10,318
|
I hit one the other day that made me go hmmmm.
I was working a "css only" layout (no tables, just class and ids defined in css) and it worked properly in IE but was messing up in FF. Checked the code 10 ways to hell, through all sorts of css checkers, changed it around in ways I know should throw it off. Bottom line was that FF was not handling the css properly but IE was. I finally figured a work around that forced it to work in FF. It was weird though, kind of like working backwards because I am so used to IE being the fucked up browser. I use FF and IE about equally.
__________________
![]() Free Adult Webcams |
|
|
|
![]() |
| Bookmarks |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|