DirectNics legal rights in relation to its recent actions

[Peaches]

This has nothing to do with teen sites, DirectNic or you. My problem is with ANYONE who throws things around like they're facts when they know nothing at all about what they're talking about. You made a very inflamatory post here w/o even READING THE DAMN THREAD.

And your comments on TOSs not being able to supersede law are just ignorant.

If DirectNic closed Slick's site down illegally then Slick can sue. Period, end of story.

[LadyMischief]

Originally Posted by Peaches

This has nothing to do with teen sites, DirectNic or you. My problem is with ANYONE who throws things around like they're facts when they know nothing at all about what they're talking about. You made a very inflamatory post here w/o even READING THE DAMN THREAD.

And your comments on TOSs not being able to supersede law are just ignorant.

If DirectNic closed Slick's site down illegally then Slick can sue. Period, end of story.

Ya well we all make mistakes Peaches. Relax, you aren't immune to humanity either.

As for my comments on TOS's, actually, I'm not ignorant. If someone put something that was against a law on the books as a term, it would not be enforcable, but as Sarretah clarified, it would have to go to court to be deemed as such. Still, the point does remain.

I agree, if they took the site down illegally, he can sue. It seems they are all working on things so I hope it comes out well, I just hope that other, less REASONABLE registrars don't get a bug and decide to start locking down domains.

[softball]

"My problem is with ANYONE who throws things around like they're facts when they know nothing at all about what they're talking about"

This would be Peaches modus operandi. She did it here for years. Now she is jumping all over LM for a mistake. When things happen this quickly, mistakes will happen. But Peaches hammering LM over it is just plain ludicrous. Peaches arguments are thin at best, so its time to sling shit again.