AdultFriendFinder.com Fake Profile Class Action Lawsuit Investigation

[Rcourt64]

Originally Posted by spazlabz

cool RCourt, I have gotten the point you are making. You feel that this suit is, at best, on shaky ground if i understand you correctly.

what I am saying, as I can't speak for anyone else here, is that if i click on a site that has the text 'Meet a girl from _______ for fucking tonight' where ____ = your local area and fucking tonight being any one of the dozens of ways I have personally seen this program advertised, that it is akin to fraud in as much as there is outright deception, not clever marketing, but outright lying going on to the consumer.

I create text to put on our tours, in order for me to write the text I actually have to watch the videos and then turn that into sales text.

http://www.drunkenteenorgies.com is a very good example of this.

Hard as it may be to believe I am mono-lingual, so i do not understand the spoken Russian language. So while I do have to invent details for the text, the general feel for each video coincides with the text I write.

If I say you are going to see 'lots' of 'gorgeous' teen girls in 'hot' action. then all of that is subjective. but if i say you will see over 300 of the hottest cum sluts alive... then I better have at least 301 videos or videos/picture sets in there with a different girl in each set.... or it is fraud.

AFF uses specific girls with specific screen names and they say they are from specific locations which is just plain bullshit, a clever script trick for geotargetting........ in my opinion, that is fraudulent marketing practices. But that is my opinion and the only one that ultimately matters is the opinion given by a judge in court.


spaz

spazlabz

I appreciate you trying to explain this to me , especially without some sort of insult towards my direction. Thank you , I respect that.

But I'm sorry, I just won't give in.
As long as its ok to malipulte or brainwash children & adults with some Red Suit Guy, which with result in the end with a donation OR purchase of a product. Then I will continue to stand my ground and support AFF. Because they're not doing anything different.

[spazlabz]

Originally Posted by Rcourt64

spazlabz

I appreciate you trying to explain this to me , especially without some sort of insult towards my direction. Thank you , I respect that.

But I'm sorry, I just won't give in.
As long as its ok to malipulte or brainwash children & adults with some Red Suit Guy, which with result in the end with a donation OR purchase of a product. Then I will continue to stand my ground and support AFF. Because they're not doing anything different.

Hey No prob at all RCourt, i don't generally go in for attacks unless i have been attacked first so its all cool.

and I can see the connection, albeit slight, between the practices of AFF and Madison Ave.

But Santa, charitible organizations and the mainstream marketing are not currently facing a lawsuit either. AFF is and I can honestly see this one going either way depending on who appointed the Fed Judge it comes in front of.


spaz

[Rcourt64]

Originally Posted by spazlabz

But Santa, charitible organizations and the mainstream marketing are not currently facing a lawsuit either. AFF is and I can honestly see this one going either way depending on who appointed the Fed Judge it comes in front of.


spaz

Well, if the courts appointed Judge decide to take down AFF for there practices,
I assume the same rules will apply for a few other million dollar websites
that I see practicing the same or similar tactics. "of which I can prove" So if they take one down, they better also be challanging the others.
Otherwise I'll see it as discriminatory.

[Rcourt64]

I was re-reading my last post & wanna point out that when I say: "of which I can prove". meaning it would be easy to do, and not that I have any actual form of prove to this sort of activity.
Someone just told me, I could get in a shitload of trouble if that is interpreted the wrong way. So I wanted to correct this.

Peace