Oprano Front Page


Go Back   Oprano Adult Industry Forums > The Business Of Porn - Closed For Posting > Legacy Archived Main Board

Notices

Legacy Archived Main Board Business chat and general industry chat. All participation is welcome. Dont post your fucking spam here.





Check Out YnotMail

The Original Oprano Flat Board (Thanks To Sarettah!)---
Oprano Swag Shop
"History Of Porn Timeline
Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 07-23-2006   #1
Greg B
Members
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Posts: 497
Default Re: Thoughts on hr4472 ?

Quote:
Originally Posted by Hammer
Sorry Greg, but I think your bubble is about to be burst, because they are talking about toons and anime when they refer to 'simulated sex'.
Nope, called in and asked on that one. They're talking digital manipulation of images or photographs/movies or CG depictions.

Problem was people were taking real photos and manipulating them to look like you know what and that pissed off too many people.

Also, using computer graphics CG stuff to simulate CP. Guys thought they would get away with it under 1st amendment because no real humans were involved.

Now it's agin' the law. Should be.
__________________
BOONE'S ADULT CARTOONS

Greg B is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-24-2006   #2
Greg B
Members
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Posts: 497
Default Re: Thoughts on hr4472 ?

So before we go into any more ridiculous interpretations of this Bill, let's do something brilliant like...

READ IT FIRST.

Below you'll see a link and some points I posted.

Seems like any more deceptive practices used on adult sites is gonna be met with harshly. If you notice not once do the words cartoon, anime, nor hentai appear.


http://www.govtrack.us/congress/bill...bill=h109-4472

9 (a) IN GENERAL.--Section 2257 of title 18, United
10 States Code, is amended--
11 (1) in subsection (a), by inserting after ``video-
12 tape,'' the following: ``digital image, digitally- or
13 computer-manipulated image of an actual human
14 being, picture,'';
15 (2) in subsection (e)(1), by adding at the end the
16 following: ``In this paragraph, the term `copy' in-
17 cludes every page of a website on which matter de-
18 scribed in subsection (a) appears.'';
19 (3) in subsection (f), by--
20 (A) in paragraph (3), by striking ``and''
21 after the semicolon;
22 ( in paragraph (4), by striking the period
23 and inserting ``; and''; and
24 (C) by adding at the end the following:
--
HR 4472 EAS 157
1 under this section shall be consecutive to any sentence im-
2 posed for the offense under that provision.''.
3 (b) CLERICAL AMENDMENT.--The table of sections at
4 the beginning of chapter 110 of title 18, United States Code,
5 is amended by adding at the end the following new item:
``2260A. Increased penalties for registered sex offenders.''.
6 SEC. 703. DECEPTION BY EMBEDDED WORDS OR IMAGES.
7 (a) IN GENERAL.--Chapter 110 of title 18, United
8 States Code, is amended by inserting after section 2252B
9 the following:
10 `` 2252C. Misleading words or digital images on the
11 Internet

12 ``(a) IN GENERAL.--Whoever knowingly embeds words
13 or digital images into the source code of a website with the
14 intent to deceive a person into viewing material consti-
15 tuting obscenity shall be fined under this title and impris-
16 oned for not more than 10 years.
17 ``(b) MINORS.--Whoever knowingly embeds words or
18 digital images into the source code of a website with the
19 intent to deceive a minor into viewing material harmful
20 to minors on the Internet shall be fined under this title and
21 imprisoned for not more than 20 years.
22 ``(c) CONSTRUCTION.--For the purposes of this section,
23 a word or digital image that clearly indicates the sexual
24 content of the site, such as `sex' or `porn', is not misleading.
25 ``(d) DEFINITIONS.--As used in this section--
HR 4472 EAS 158
1 ``(1) the terms `material that is harmful to mi-
2 nors' and `sex' have the meaning given such terms in
3 section 2252B; and
4 ``(2) the term `source code' means the combina-
5 tion of text and other characters comprising the con-
6 tent, both viewable and nonviewable, of a web page,
7 including any website publishing language, program-
8 ming language, protocol or functional content, as well
9 as any successor languages or protocols.''.
10 (b) TABLE SECTIONS.--The table of sections for
OF
11 chapter 110 of title 18, United States Code, is amended by
12 inserting after the item relating to section 2252B the fol-
13 lowing:
``2252C. Misleading words or digital images on the Internet.''.
__________________
BOONE'S ADULT CARTOONS

Greg B is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-24-2006   #3
Hammer
Master of My Domains
 
Hammer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Florida
Posts: 1,701
Default Re: Thoughts on hr4472 ?

4472 and 2257 do not directly affect anime or erotic drawings, but the new changes will have a trickle down effect on the government's definition of obscenity and although you won't have to deal with the record keeping issues, you will have issues. There have been obscenity arrests lately concerning both erotic stories and illustrations so depending on what is depicted in your illustrations, you still need to be concerned.

I'm not saying that the government's attack on our rights of free speech is constitutional, but it's happening all the same.
__________________
Porn Site Pros - Custom Website Design, Turnkey Webcam and Pay Sites, SEO, and Consulting
Hammer is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-24-2006   #4
Greg B
Members
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Posts: 497
Default Re: Thoughts on hr4472 ?

Quote:
Originally Posted by Hammer
4472 and 2257 do not directly affect anime or erotic drawings, but the new changes will have a trickle down effect on the government's definition of obscenity and although you won't have to deal with the record keeping issues, you will have issues. There have been obscenity arrests lately concerning both erotic stories and illustrations so depending on what is depicted in your illustrations, you still need to be concerned.

I'm not saying that the government's attack on our rights of free speech is constitutional, but it's happening all the same.
Hammer I can understand your concerns but let me explain what's going on here in regard to my line of work.

This Bill is for the general control of real creepy criminal fuckheads. If you're a decent enough webmaster you've nothing to be worried about. It's for those real evil pieces of shit that prey on children. They should be taken out and beaten with an axe handle if you ask me.

Leaning on a person doing illustrations carries with it a very, very harsh penalty regarding 1st amendment rights. Fuck up on a case like that and you will be forking out tens of millions of dollars in recompense. Literature and art are a major no no in prosecution because it carries so harshly a litigation factor of immense magnitude.

However, it's what you do with that art and literature is what can get you in trouble. If you deliberately administer it to underagers, as in this Bill if you read closely, the misleading use to solicit underagers then you're in deep shit. But you have to PROVE that deliberate action. It has to be so obvious it's without question. Ever hear of 'reasonable doubt'?

This Bill is only a means to give law enforcement and prosecutors the extra edge they need to go after the real pieces of deranged shit in our society. That's all. It's not gonna be a witch hunt because Republicans like their porn too.
__________________
BOONE'S ADULT CARTOONS

Greg B is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-24-2006   #5
Hammer
Master of My Domains
 
Hammer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Florida
Posts: 1,701
Default Re: Thoughts on hr4472 ?

It sounds like you seriously believe that this bill actually has something to do with child porn.

"Literature and art are a major no no in prosecution because it carries so harshly a litigation factor of immense magnitude."

I take it you're not familiar with the Red Rose case.
__________________
Porn Site Pros - Custom Website Design, Turnkey Webcam and Pay Sites, SEO, and Consulting
Hammer is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-24-2006   #6
Greg B
Members
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Posts: 497
Default Re: Thoughts on hr4472 ?

Quote:
Originally Posted by Hammer
It sounds like you seriously believe that this bill actually has something to do with child porn.

"Literature and art are a major no no in prosecution because it carries so harshly a litigation factor of immense magnitude."

I take it you're not familiar with the Red Rose case.
Do you have a link to this case?

This bill explains exactly what it's about.
__________________
BOONE'S ADULT CARTOONS

Greg B is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-24-2006   #7
Greg B
Members
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Posts: 497
Default Re: Thoughts on hr4472 ?

Don't sweat it Hammer. I talked to the experts. This Bill is only for the scumbags who deliberately use their websites and skills to commit crimes like luring kids to their websites for purposes of seducing them.
__________________
BOONE'S ADULT CARTOONS

Greg B is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 01:15 AM..


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright Evil Empire Inc. 2006-2022