Survey Time: Models in Boys Underwear

[Peaches]

I'm glad Christmas and your birthday are at the same time so I can lump this into one gift:

http://www.oprano.com/msgboard/showthread.php?t=47295

[Sabby]

Oh come on. I have some supergirl and bettyboop "boyshorts" I bought in the ladies lingerie section of walmart.

Boyshorts are much more popular and trendy than thongs are now.

And you can wear them around the house with just a tshirt.


Sabby

[Sabby]

These do look kinda girlie but they were bought in the ladies lingerie section of Walmart. And I'm 35 and obviously not teen content.


Sabby

[Hell Puppy]

Originally Posted by Sabby

These do look kinda girlie but they were bought in the ladies lingerie section of Walmart. And I'm 35 and obviously not teen content.


Sabby

The tummy pic gives me a tongue-on, does that make me a pedo?

Where'd Peaches go? We need a judgement. I must've been wrong about her being able to take it as well as she dishes it...

[gonzo]

Originally Posted by Hell Puppy

The tummy pic gives me a tongue-on, does that make me a pedo?

Where'd Peaches go? We need a judgement. I must've been wrong about her being able to take it as well as she dishes it...

I think shes having dinner with her good friend John Ip.

[Peaches]

Originally Posted by Hell Puppy

The tummy pic gives me a tongue-on, does that make me a pedo?

Where'd Peaches go? We need a judgement. I must've been wrong about her being able to take it as well as she dishes it...

Nope, just finally realized where this went. As I told you, I wanted notice - I got it.

BTW, you never once told me the model you were putting the little boy's underoos on was over 18. In fact, you constantly referred to her on SMS as 18. So, is she? Or were you putting them on the model that you showed the picture of, who is not 18?

I thought we had agreed to disagree. I don't think little children's clothing should be used on models who are months or a year over legal age. You turned that into me saying you were a pedo and stealing money when we all know you'd be tapping into my box of Todd Toys. Personally, I don't think a single person is going to join your site using "Batman Comics" as a search phrase.

I DO think putting someone barely legal in little children's clothing is not a line I would personally cross. Someone like the model you posted or Sabby are different. I already said that when I used Vanilla as an example on the playground. That's MY opinion. I gave it. I realized my mistake.

It's like I told someone I was dating who asked me if I loved him: "Don't ask the question if you're not ready for all the possible answers.".

[Jace]

Originally Posted by Sabby

Oh come on. I have some supergirl and bettyboop "boyshorts" I bought in the ladies lingerie section of walmart.

Boyshorts are much more popular and trendy than thongs are now.

And you can wear them around the house with just a tshirt.


Sabby

honey, they are talking about something different....boy shorts made for grown women is something COMPLETELY different than a producer handing a 22 year old woman a bag full of panties made for "kids 10-12" and wanting her to wear them

[Sabby]

Originally Posted by Jace

honey, they are talking about something different....boy shorts made for grown women is something COMPLETELY different than a producer handing a 22 year old woman a bag full of panties made for "kids 10-12" and wanting her to wear them

Yes but they probably arent going to look much different except the childs garments arent going to say "hottie" on them.

Why dont you just buy some plain woman's boyshorts or panties and print out a superhero iron on transfer and make them yourself? I think that would be an easy and ethical solution.


Sabby

[Jace]

Originally Posted by Sabby

Yes but they probably arent going to look much different except the childs garments arent going to say "hottie" on them.

Why dont you just buy some plain woman's boyshorts or panties and print out a superhero iron on transfer and make them yourself? I think that would be an easy and ethical solution.


Sabby

I will have to dig out some pics for you, cause they look WAY different

snug fitting sexy boy shorts for women look nothing like an 11 year olds panties...if they do, then you are not a good parent

[Sabby]

Originally Posted by Jace

I will have to dig out some pics for you, cause they look WAY different

snug fitting sexy boy shorts for women look nothing like an 11 year olds panties...if they do, then you are not a good parent

I have all boys (15, 13, 11). They all wear boxers.

And they would be absolutely mortified if I made them wear "batman" panties.


Sabby

[JR]

i am confused. everyone got pissy pretty fast

dressing up "models" in boys underwear is disturbing... you should be fantasizing about whats under there... and hopefully not imagining a giant a big cock jumping out of her shorts.

but thats just me.

[gonzo]

Originally Posted by JR

i am confused. everyone got pissy pretty fast

dressing up "models" in boys underwear is disturbing... you should be fantasizing about whats under there... and hopefully not imagining a giant a big cock jumping out of her shorts.

but thats just me.

Its a costume. Plain and simple. No different than a boa or a leather G.

[JR]

Originally Posted by gonzo

Its a costume. Plain and simple. No different than a boa or a leather G.

is dressing up like a 6yr old girl and taking sexually suggestive photographs "just a costume"? last i checked its absolutely, 100% illegal.

[gonzo]

Originally Posted by JR

is dressing up like a 6yr old girl and taking sexually suggestive photographs "just a costume"? last i checked its absolutely, 100% illegal.

I dont dress like a 6 year old. I dont have the figure for it...and I dont work with anyone under 18.

Youd have to ask one of the "teen" program owners.

[Peaches]

Originally Posted by JR

is dressing up like a 6yr old girl and taking sexually suggestive photographs "just a costume"? last i checked its absolutely, 100% illegal.

edit:

Oh wait, didn't read that right - I have no idea if it's legal or illegal. Not my side of the fence to worry about that. I said it was not something *I* consider right.

[JR]

Originally Posted by Peaches

Yep, it's legal. I already said that.

i am not going to look it up.... but i am 99.9% sure that intentionally making a model look under age and depicting her in graphic sexual shots is illegal. i remember reading up on the laws about this and remember the comments of someone once on netpond, claiming to be a police officer many years ago that completely broke it down (i believe it was right after one of the big busts in vancouver - with the underage girl on cam).

[Hell Puppy]

Originally Posted by JR

i am not going to look it up.... but i am 99.9% sure that intentionally making a model look under age and depicting her in graphic sexual shots is illegal. i remember reading up on the laws about this and remember the comments of someone once on netpond, claiming to be a police officer many years ago that completely broke it down (i believe it was right after one of the big busts in vancouver - with the underage girl on cam).

Yeah, that's my recollection as well. And whether it's legal or not, you're going after pedo's if you're intentionally trying to make the audience THINK she's under 18.

I have no idea what all the ins and outs are, maybe as long as you state all models are over 18 you're free and clear. I dont know, that's not a park I play in regardless of what Peaches thinks.

But there are some sites that clearly push the edge of that envelope. I checked the sponsor list, so I'll name a couple of names that aren't on the protected list....hehe. Recent example is Little April....she looks 15 and they appear to do everything they can to keep it that way. Another one that comes to mind that is independent is Kirsten of Kirsten's Room....she looks like a pudgy 16 year old....and has looked that way for what? 8 years or so now? She's gotta be pushing 30...hehe.