Survey Time: Models in Boys Underwear

[Hell Puppy]

Originally Posted by Jace

as long as it is solely for the novelty of wearing underoos

My wife went through too many shoots with fucking perverts that wish she had been 14....from the pig tails to the 12 years old underwear...NEVER again...no offense to those that like that shit, but if you like to see girls in pigtails and wearing underwear that is for 10-12 year olds, you have something seriously wrong and you need help big time

And there-in lies what I think is the important differentiation. If you're trying to portray the model as a child whether it's obvious that they're over 18 or not, then that's a problem.

[Hell Puppy]

Ok, here's another one. I didn't get Peaches response to this last night since she was too inebraited to message properly...and I'm curious....

Are you catering to pedo's if you shoot a model on a playground (with no kids around of course)?

[Peaches]

Originally Posted by Hell Puppy

Ok, here's another one. I didn't get Peaches response to this last night since she was too inebraited to message properly...and I'm curious....

Are you catering to pedo's if you shoot a model on a playground (with no kids around of course)?

I said yes - again, 18 year old girls don't hang out at playgrounds. When you portray an 18 year old girl doing things that YOUNGER (i.e. underaged) girls do, IMO, you're crossing the line.

Put someone who obviously cannot be mistaken for someone underaged and it's a different story. Vanilla, for instance, on a playground isn't going to make anyone think she might be under 18.

BUT AGAIN, I am NOT your moral compass. I'm merely stating my personal opinion and we all know I'm a prude, especially when it comes to kids.

And yes, I have a huge problem with the NN underage sites too and I think what you're doing is a helluva lot less worse than those. You're safe on that stance

[Hell Puppy]

Originally Posted by Peaches

I said yes - again, 18 year old girls don't hang out at playgrounds. When you portray an 18 year old girl doing things that YOUNGER (i.e. underaged) girls do, IMO, you're crossing the line.

Put someone who obviously cannot be mistaken for someone underaged and it's a different story. Vanilla, for instance, on a playground isn't going to make anyone think she might be under 18.

So it's ok for Vanilla. And we're agreeing on this point, it's NOT OK to do it if the model looks under 18.

But you know me. You haven't seen a pic or even know what model I'm working with, and you assume I have one that looks like Little April in underoo's?

Thanks for the vote of confidence and trust.

I'm with GonZo on this one, I reckon we're somewhere below John IP on the list.

[gonzo]

Originally Posted by Hell Puppy

I'm with GonZo on this one, I reckon we're somewhere below John IP on the list.

Strange value system.

[Peaches]

OK, so do I start keeping my opinions to myself in fear of pissing you off? I can do that, but you better be prepared to stuff my mouth constantly full of food so I'll shut up.

And no, you're not below anyone - I JUST GAVE YOU MY OPINION ABOUT ONE SITUATION. I swear you're worse than a chick.

[gonzo]

Originally Posted by Peaches

OK, so do I start keeping my opinions to myself in fear of pissing you off? I can do that, but you better be prepared to stuff my mouth constantly full of food so I'll shut up.

And no, you're not below anyone - I JUST GAVE YOU MY OPINION ABOUT ONE SITUATION. I swear you're worse than a chick.

Im surprised and disgusted that you could even imagine either of us being capabile of such an act.

[Peaches]

Originally Posted by gonzo

Im surprised and disgusted that you could even imagine either of us being capabile of such an act.

Okee dokee, where did I say you did "such an act"? I merely voiced an opinion over one of the props. I am a prude. I personally don't think it's kosher to put little boy's Underoos on an 18 year old model, and I said so (in private). I probably also wouldn't do a LOT of things you do and there are probably a lot of things I'd do that you wouldn't do - unless you're into men.

Don't turn a molehill into my steep driveway or no one will be going to Disneyworld on Gay Day.

[Peaches]

Originally Posted by Hell Puppy

And there-in lies what I think is the important differentiation. If you're trying to portray the model as a child whether it's obvious that they're over 18 or not, then that's a problem.

Adults don't wear little kid's underwear. I am willing to bet you a dinner at Bones or Chops (your choice) that no one signs up for that site using the search words "Batman comics".

I have less problems with braces, pigtails and lollipops - at least adults wear braces, pigtails and eat lollipops. They don't wear little kid's underwear!!

(tomorrow night there is going to be animated discussion - I just feel it in my bones )

[Jace]

Originally Posted by Peaches

Adults don't wear little kid's underwear. I am willing to bet you a dinner at Bones or Chops (your choice) that no one signs up for that site using the search words "Batman comics".

I have less problems with braces, pigtails and lollipops - at least adults wear braces, pigtails and eat lollipops. They don't wear little kid's underwear!!

(tomorrow night there is going to be animated discussion - I just feel it in my bones )

believe it or not, my wife and I spent a week a while back trying to find underoos for adults....and a lot of the underwear made for women now is silly and colorful like underoos can be....so, there is a fine line...but if you buy underwear that says on the label "kids 10-12" on it, then there is something wrong

[Peaches]

Originally Posted by Jace

but if you buy underwear that says on the label "kids 10-12" on it, then there is something wrong

THANK YOU!!

[Hell Puppy]

Originally Posted by Peaches

I have less problems with braces, pigtails and lollipops - at least adults wear braces, pigtails and eat lollipops. They don't wear little kid's underwear!!

that's just totally fucked up and illogical.

(tomorrow night there is going to be animated discussion - I just feel it in my bones )

or not, i'm starting to think i might be better off at the press screening for nacho libre....it wont piss me off.

[Peaches]

Originally Posted by Hell Puppy

or not, i'm starting to think i might be better off at the press screening for nacho libre....it wont piss me off.

Well, since Kathi might not make it either, I guess that leaves me and I can certainly use that time to study

I don't know why any of this would piss you off - this is just the opinion of a prudish old chick. You're not going to lose a dime or any respect from anyone who matters

[Hell Puppy]

Originally Posted by Peaches

Well, since Kathi might not make it either, I guess that leaves me and I can certainly use that time to study

I don't know why any of this would piss you off - this is just the opinion of a prudish old chick. You're not going to lose a dime or any respect from anyone who matters

Let me see if I can 'splain it to ya...

I dont mind a spirited debate....that's why I'm continuing to go back and forth. And I dont expect to agree with you all the time. You take it and give it back as well as anyone I know....even if your logic is sometimes faulty. And you're right, I honestly dont give a shit what anyone thnks about the subject at hand, i KNOW in my heart that I can post the pics, the members will think it's cute and i wont lure a single pedophile with them.

Here's where I get cheesed off...

You rush to judgement against me with very little information, no actual pics, no knowledge of the model. You up and accuse me of going pedo, then in this thread lump me in with scammers and thieves in the industry. Where as if you were doing the same thing, I'd likely say "ok, i assume you know what you're doing" and think nothing more about it.

To me, I take it in much the same way as if I were in your house and some money turned up missing, and you asked if I took it.

[Peaches]

Originally Posted by Hell Puppy

Here's where I get cheesed off...

You rush to judgement against me with very little information, no actual pics, no knowledge of the model. You up and accuse me of going pedo, then in this thread lump me in with scammers and thieves in the industry. Where as if you were doing the same thing, I'd likely say "ok, i assume you know what you're doing" and think nothing more about it.

To me, I take it in much the same way as if I were in your house and some money turned up missing, and you asked if I took it.

ASSumption seems to be faulty on BOTH sides then as I've done nothing of the sort. Edited to add: intentionally I've done nothing of the sort.

However, if you are at my house and my boxers with little pugs on them are missing, I'm going to ask you if you took them.

[gonzo]

Originally Posted by Peaches

However, if you are at my house and my boxers with little pugs on them are missing, I'm going to ask you if you took them.

This one is high and tight. I will resist.