The possibillities are absolutely staggering

[sarettah]

Originally Posted by DrGuile

If you back pedal any faster, you'll go right through that wall...


your first post was implying the .01% number wasnt much to ask for and that the 10-20% should be within reason, giving unbelivable numbers...

I think you're math is flawed, and that you knew it but pulled a FoxNews.

lolol...nopers I used OUTRAGEOUS on purpose. If I wanted to do a fox I would have stated that a program could get 1.92 million joins a month and then I would have attacked you as an unpatriotic asshole when you questioned the numbers and then I would have just started talking about WMDs and terrorism and your complete support of them

As far as the math being flawed. It is up there for you to look at and peruse to your heart's content. If an adjustment needs to be made, point it out to me and I will make it. I screw up all the time and since I laid it out in excel and it is an MS product the potential for error is definitely there

[sarettah]

Just an addendum....

Do I think 10-20% response rate for a properly targetted campaign is reasonable? Most definitely. I have stated that before and I will stand behind it.

Do I think that a 10-20% response rate from Oprano webmasters sending 100% of their traffic to a program would produce 193,000 joins a month ? Hell no. The numbers say that that is the potential, my brain says it is not reasonable.