US aproves...

[Inabon]

i mean aside from history of 3 wars where civilians got fucked buy every military force.

don't tell me you believe they are 100% 0 casualties.

[Dravyk]

Originally Posted by Inabon

i mean aside from history of 3 wars where civilians got fucked buy every military force.

don't tell me you believe they are 100% 0 casualties.

Mistakes happen. You just seem to want to believe the worse, especially if it's America is all. And I'm wondering why that bias.

[Inabon]

Originally Posted by Dravyk

Mistakes happen. You just seem to want to believe the worse, especially if it's America is all. And I'm wondering why that bias.

no man

i am not saying america is the worse i like america but i just wish you and others will realize that you are not always 100% correct and that there is more to the world than america.

all of you jumped to the conclusion that the report saying citizens were being burnt was paranoid.

now that military says they used it but they did not shoot civilians but they used it.

just by using it they increased the chances of that article being true by 100 fold.

i would have shut up if the usa did not say they used the damn weapon but they did


that is the whole point.

[Dravyk]

Originally Posted by Inabon

no man

i am not saying america is the worse i like america but i just wish you and others will realize that you are not always 100% correct and that there is more to the world than america.

all of you jumped to the conclusion that the report saying citizens were being burnt was paranoid.

now that military says they used it but they did not shoot civilians but they used it.

just by using it they increased the chances of that article being true by 100 fold.

i would have shut up if the usa did not say they used the damn weapon but they did


that is the whole point.

First, I know there's more to the world than America. (But what does that have to do with this article and you believing it so readily?)

Second, no, no one jumped saying it was paranoia. Folks jumped because it came out a year later from an unreliable source, and during the ensuing year somehow it never came out. It was subscribed to as possible propaganda, not paranoia.

Oh, so before the important thing was using it against citizens, now using it at all is the point. Ok, you seem to change things to suit an obvious bias against America.

Here's the funny thing. I am willing to say it COULD happen, but probably didn't. You however seem unwilling to say it COULD NOT happen, and that it MUST have happened.

So while you intimate that "we" are closed minded. I have to say that better describes "you" than "us".

And again, I'm wondering why?

And I'll be back later to find out the answer. ... SHould you answer it.

[Trev]

Originally Posted by Dravyk

First, I know there's more to the world than America. (But what does that have to do with this article and you believing it so readily?)

Second, no, no one jumped saying it was paranoia. Folks jumped because it came out a year later from an unreliable source, and during the ensuing year somehow it never came out. It was subscribed to as possible propaganda, not paranoia.

Oh, so before the important thing was using it against citizens, now using it at all is the point. Ok, you seem to change things to suit an obvious bias against America.

Here's the funny thing. I am willing to say it COULD happen, but probably didn't. You however seem unwilling to say it COULD NOT happen, and that it MUST have happened.

So while you intimate that "we" are closed minded. I have to say that better describes "you" than "us".

And again, I'm wondering why?

And I'll be back later to find out the answer. ... SHould you answer it.

I'll just drop my two bits in and say that it may not have happened but it probably did.