US forces used chemical weapons?

[JR]

Originally Posted by Inabon

same crap that made credible all the horror shit that happened in vietnam man.


you just don't get it...

everytime some country claims USA abused power it is immediately put down as not credible but when cnn said that sadam had weapons of mass destruction (after bush did) then that is the truth.

that is the fucking point but i am not surprised at the fact that you did not read between the lines.

dude.... no one is talking about "everytime" here. regardless of what massive conspiracy theories you have and what conclusions your professional pyschological analysis of the group here have let you to... people were commenting on ONE article that even the most biased person would have to admit is suspicious.

do you think that all the people you are talking to right now are 100% behind bush.. the war? the decisions that were made? CNN? i could suggest as well that you "don't get it" since its fairly clear you are not paying attention and just looking for an excuse to rant.... which is fine... just a little off point.

your arguments above are a little silly. the fact that Saddam has weapons of mass destruction BEFORE the war was NEVER disputed by anyone but Iraq. It was not disputed by the UN, Hans Blix or anyone else. Lets not start defending Saddam or pretend that the average person had reason to believe that he was just an ok guy. Some in the international community wanted evidence that he was threat or a big enough threat that warranted a war... but NO ONE was disputing what he was up to... and i might add that most of those who were most concerned had all kinds of illegal oil deals in violation of the oil for food program with Saddam or multi billion dollar debts they hoped to collect - France, Russia, China etc. Morality, right and wrong and "facts" have nothing to do with anything. Money makes the world turn.... not happy thoughts and hugs.

Iraq war is not about anything for ANY side other than straight politics and economics. the "hows" "whys" and "whos" are irrelevent. always have been. its all just theater and scenery to conceal the uglier truth.

and when your arguments revolve around language like "everytime" "you don't get it" and "read between the lines"... you have no argument.

[Mike AI]

Ouch!

I guess he is JR AI

Originally Posted by JR

dude.... no one is talking about "everytime" here. regardless of what massive conspiracy theories you have and what conclusions your professional pyschological analysis of the group here have let you to... people were commenting on ONE article that even the most biased person would have to admit is suspicious.

do you think that all the people you are talking to right now are 100% behind bush.. the war? the decisions that were made? CNN? i could suggest as well that you "don't get it" since its fairly clear you are not paying attention and just looking for an excuse to rant.... which is fine... just a little off point.

your arguments above are a little silly. the fact that Saddam has weapons of mass destruction BEFORE the war was NEVER disputed by anyone but Iraq. It was not disputed by the UN, Hans Blix or anyone else. Lets not start defending Saddam or pretend that the average person had reason to believe that he was just an ok guy. Some in the international community wanted evidence that he was threat or a big enough threat that warranted a war... but NO ONE was disputing what he was up to... and i might add that most of those who were most concerned had all kinds of illegal oil deals in violation of the oil for food program with Saddam or multi billion dollar debts they hoped to collect - France, Russia, China etc. Morality, right and wrong and "facts" have nothing to do with anything. Money makes the world turn.... not happy thoughts and hugs.

Iraq war is not about anything for ANY side other than straight politics and economics. the "hows" "whys" and "whos" are irrelevent. always have been. its all just theater and scenery to conceal the uglier truth.

and when your arguments revolve around language like "everytime" "you don't get it" and "read between the lines"... you have no argument.

[Inabon]

Originally Posted by Mike AI

Ouch!

I guess he is JR AI

yeah just another Zealot

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Zealot

[Mike AI]

Word of the day dictionary?

Originally Posted by Inabon

yeah just another Zealot

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Zealot

[Inabon]

Originally Posted by Mike AI

Word of the day dictionary?

yeah did you read it?

[grimm]

Originally Posted by Inabon

yeah did you read it?

is it in engrish, esse?

[grimm]

da plane, da plane!

[Inabon]

Originally Posted by grimm

is it in engrish, esse?

yeah man it is and it is a word a bit more complicated than apple, pie or hamburger.


some of us spics did learn some stuff in school.