Quote:
Originally posted by PornoDoggy@Aug 20 2004, 08:07 PM
Your family members who live in Texas liked him as governor. Wow. That fucking changes everything.  
Bush's policies of unilateral intervention will serve America as well as the isolationist policies of Harding, Coolege, and Hoover (not to mention Taft, et al) did.
I love the way the decisive leader stood behind his conviction that a commission to investigate 9/11 wasn't necessary.
I love the way the focused President stood up to his political oppenents and insisted that the recommendations of the panel (that he didn't want in the first place) would take a considerable amount of time to study before implementation.
I am particularly fond of the way this gutsy, decisive leader opposed the creation of Homeland Security as a cabinet level department.
|
he does not want a cabinet position that does not answer to him and him only. Its a merry go round. so now we have our commander in chief as the "buck stops here guy" when it comes to intelligence? think of the pandora' box that opens. He s an elected official, responsible to the people. He cannot be in the business of keeping secrets to that degree. There is a reason for separate organizations. But they have to operate outside the authority of the president. The way it is to be set up now is ridiculous.
As far as the 9/11 commission. They did a bang up job. to bad Bush adopted 3 resolutions. the only three that would leave him with absolute power.
I like tax cuts as much as the next guy, but the actions or lack thereof of our President, will undoubtedly assure us somebody new. I just wish it wasnt Kerry
08-21-2004
Hybrid Mode
