Interesting Anti-Spam technique

Nickatilynx · 05-07-2003

hehehehehe

Most filters do not work anyway if the mail is unique ;-))))

This game is about giving away the old secrets not the new ones.

Colin,remember the engines?

Find out what they want and give it to them....for .00001 of a sec ;-)))

************************************************

JR wrote :

2) the bulk of spam is coming from a small group of people. my guess is that it is really small. probably at least 50% of all spam comes from no more than 50 people.

true!

3) its becomming less and less profitable daily. its becomming less and less easy to keep relays online. its becomming less and less possible to find cooperative ISPs... and more difficult to create ISP's for this main purpose.

Absolutely!

""i also unsubscribe to almost mail i get.""

Then you have become a prime mail three mths from now ;-)))

Last edited by Nickatilynx at May 7 2003, 03:53 PM

Thread Tools
Show Printable Version Email this Page
Display Modes
Switch to Linear Mode Switch to Hybrid Mode Threaded Mode

05-07-2003	#9
Nickatilynx Banned Want to see your own Advertising Here! Join Date: Oct 2002 Location: Vancouver Canada Posts: 15,115	hehehehehe Most filters do not work anyway if the mail is unique ;-)))) This game is about giving away the old secrets not the new ones. Colin,remember the engines? Find out what they want and give it to them....for .00001 of a sec ;-))) ************************************************ JR wrote : 2) the bulk of spam is coming from a small group of people. my guess is that it is really small. probably at least 50% of all spam comes from no more than 50 people. true! 3) its becomming less and less profitable daily. its becomming less and less easy to keep relays online. its becomming less and less possible to find cooperative ISPs... and more difficult to create ISP's for this main purpose. Absolutely! ""i also unsubscribe to almost mail i get."" Then you have become a prime mail three mths from now ;-))) Last edited by Nickatilynx at May 7 2003, 03:53 PM