Iraq 'accepts Un Resolution'

[PornoDoggy]

I feel very, very sorry for anyone who thinks Iraq's "agreement" today is worth the paper it's printed on. Slowing things down for a bit might be a good thing ... we may need to work a little harder to get control of the last country we invaded before we take on another project.

Just out of curiousity, who you gonna nuke? Japan was a nation - we kinda knew where they were, and we dropped the nukes on them to save American (and Japanese) lives. When we dropped nukes on Japan we didn't have to worry about a dozen other smaller, less stable, nations following our lead and using them when they were attacked too. al Qaida isn't a nation. They may or may not be getting support from some governments. They are here today, and gone tomorrow, which makes targeting problematic, and the collateral damage a bit off the chart. What exactly would nuking somebody accomplish, and who you gonna nuke?

Saddam didn't have anything to do with 9/11. Trust me, if he had we'd know about it by now. The attempts at linkage are pretty feeble, and I suppose GW considered them necessary to sell the war to the public. I hope it doesn't backfire on him, because I have long believed it's a job we need to do. I just hope it doesn't cause us to take our eyes off the other enemy.



Last edited by PornoDoggy at Nov 13 2002, 07:54 PM