![]() |
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
|||
|
|
|||||||
| Notices |
| Legacy Archived Main Board Business chat and general industry chat. All participation is welcome. Dont post your fucking spam here. |

|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
|
#6 | |
|
Washing Bishop's Dogs
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: MontrealQuebecCanada
Posts: 211
|
Quote:
TMM vs. Shellee Hale is based on the sort of "reporting" you show when you say our case was dismissed. Obviously our case was never dismissed since Shellee is not at liberty to discuss the details with you, just as Mark can't talk about it. But maybe that's why you thought that. Why are you under the impression it was dismissed? What's the source for that info? What's up widdat? Cases like TMM's against Hale are important because they're "shots across the bough" of any future attempts to libel or gain cheap page views from false controversy. While Mark was quite happy with the outcome of our case, I'm afraid TMM might not want to just settle, but go for the jugular. If I ever say anything about that case, I'll get my facts straight first.
__________________
YOU Are Industry News ![]() By Webmasters For Webmasters Send In Your PR: pr@payoutmag.com ICQ: 248843947 Skype: Mediaguy1 |
|
|
|
|
| Bookmarks |
| Tags |
| shellee hale |
|
|