The state of porn

[gonzo]

Originally Posted by LizAEBN

I'm down for just about anything from Jenna and Ava Rose to Belladonna and Sasha Gray - it's not that, believe me! I had a whole conversation Friday night with a bunch of folks about "porn for women" (yeh, I commented on the dead thread too) and I argue that "porn for women" is "porn that doesn't suck." It's that simple. I like amatuer - I am a huge Abby Winters fan - and I get down on slick production (Ninn Worx makes me smile) too, so it's not even a matter of that. It's simply that all the talent sucked monkeys for spooge.

It's not hot when the stares at the camera like it's about to bite her and stuffs a set of beads up her ass. It's less hot when a guy enters the frame and spits on her twat and slaps it before stuffing his meat in, while she's half upside down and trying desperately to rub her clit into something resembling interest.

It's just not hot, anyway you cut it.

And you know, I get the arguement that you've gotta take talent where you can in this business, but holy crap, y'all - there are so many single girl sites out there, some of them have to have some talent for looking like they are actually interested in what's going on below their waists.

I was saying that was more the case in the earlier days.
I can see your interested though. I think you should set up a fan site for your pool entourage.

I can register buttermybuns.com if you want.