TGPs skimming off thumb from sponsor gallery

cj · 08-13-2004

now you are just being an idiot ...

should *I* get out the crayons!?!?

>>Celebrity Bling would work much better for all of it's affiliates if you'd pay $45 per free signup! But I'm sure you wont do that because you're inflexible!

Not paying $45 per free signup makes me inflexible?!?!?! LMAO What a stupid thing to say on so many levels .... I asked a question about the flexibility of how the skim works and you respond with this? Your telling me that being flexible on the skim would cost you as much as it would cost me to pay $45 per free join?!?!?

LMAO

>Just another sponsor looking out for yourself, good to know in advance!

yeah ok HP, that's why i'm trying to have a discussion with tgp owners about alternatives to the standard skim procedure which will work for both tgp webmaster and sponsor, & you are carrying on like your skim is the secret of the freaking universe. Here you are defending your SHAVE as if you will go broke without it?!

Talk about the shoes switching feet.

You can accuse me of a lot of things, but looking out for myself over others has never been something i've been guilty of.

From what your telling me, no tgp can survive without skimming traffic from every single gallery, and that if they aren't allowed to skim, they won't list your galleries at all?!

Simple question ... lmk if you want me to type slower.

08-13-2004	#21
cj Members Want to see your own Advertising Here! Join Date: Oct 2002 Location: Down Under Posts: 5,202	now you are just being an idiot ... should I get out the crayons!?!? >>Celebrity Bling would work much better for all of it's affiliates if you'd pay $45 per free signup! But I'm sure you wont do that because you're inflexible! Not paying $45 per free signup makes me inflexible?!?!?! LMAO What a stupid thing to say on so many levels .... I asked a question about the flexibility of how the skim works and you respond with this? Your telling me that being flexible on the skim would cost you as much as it would cost me to pay $45 per free join?!?!? LMAO >Just another sponsor looking out for yourself, good to know in advance! yeah ok HP, that's why i'm trying to have a discussion with tgp owners about alternatives to the standard skim procedure which will work for both tgp webmaster and sponsor, & you are carrying on like your skim is the secret of the freaking universe. Here you are defending your SHAVE as if you will go broke without it?! Talk about the shoes switching feet. You can accuse me of a lot of things, but looking out for myself over others has never been something i've been guilty of. From what your telling me, no tgp can survive without skimming traffic from every single gallery, and that if they aren't allowed to skim, they won't list your galleries at all?! Simple question ... lmk if you want me to type slower.