![]() |
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
|||
|
|
|||||||
| Notices |
| Legacy Archived Main Board Business chat and general industry chat. All participation is welcome. Dont post your fucking spam here. |

|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
|
#6 |
|
Cramming 3 people in a Room to Attend Show
Want to see your own Advertising Here!
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Amid the Cornfields of Illinois
Posts: 5,366
|
Not sure which election you mean ... in 60, he may very well have been the most qualified candiate on paper. Bay of Pigs would have still been a clusterfuck, as probably would Vietnam; just not sure he would have been the right hand at the helm during the Cuban Missle Crisis, and I suspect he would have slowed down the course of civil rights, leading to more domestic conflict.
By 68 ... not sure it would have made much difference between Nixon and Humphrey, at least for Americans. The absence of Kissenger would have made things vastly different for a lot of Chileans, Timorese, etc. In 72, the Democrats were taken captive the same way the Republicans had in '64. It was no race. He was hated every bit as much as Bush or Clinton; and in spite of his demons and his criminal activity he did a tremendous amount of good. He was a far better president than Carter, Reagan, Bush I & II, and probably even Clinton. BTW ... Ike is probably the most underrated President of the 20th Century.
__________________
SEX STORY TEXT Exotic Material for Adult Websites Available for part time (project or ongoing) work ... |
|
|
|
| Bookmarks |
|
|