Screen Caps from 2257Safe.com....

[pornlaw]

Since this is my "home" board I wanted to give you guys the first look and I know you will give some honest feedback....

And this is not the final versions since we are still taking feedback from beta testers...

These are not all the screens obviously, just an example of some of them. Overall there is about 10-12 screens in the various modes.

Remember, I am not the programmer - Dan from Y-Tracker is, so if you have questions that I cant answer, I will try to get him to come over and provide some insight.

..........

This is the same as the screen which sorts by URLs, but illustrates what it looks like when the URLs panel has been expanded with a click. Many panels in this application can be expanded large with a click on the panel's "+" sign.

This panel shows that we are now in record "Creation Mode". The motif is green which indicates that everything we are entering in here are brand new records, not edits of anything existing. This panel shows the first step in creating a brand new model entry.

This screen shows that we are still in "Create Mode" and displays the panels for adding photo identification to the model name we created in the previous screen.

This screen shows the first step in creating a Content Record. A user can choose to create a single-scene Title, or if their Title contains multiple scenes such as a video they can choose that but it all starts here.

This screen illustrates how the user will attach a model release/18 USC 2257 doc to a particular model for a particular Content Title or Scene. The model is selected, the release file is uploaded and saved.

This screen shows that we are still in "Create Mode" due to the green motif. This panel shows the model's release in an expanded form for better viewing.

Thanks....

Michael

www.AdultBizLaw.com
www.2257Safe.com

[tony404]

now do you spider the site for all urls for that model or does site owner have to imput them all? it looks really good.

[pornlaw]

Originally Posted by tony404

now do you spider the site for all urls for that model or does site owner have to imput them all? it looks really good.

Thanks and a great suggestion... I will ask Dan if this an option.

Michael

www.AdultBizLaw.com
www.2257Safe.com

[kmdguy]

Hi folks,

Dan here with 2257Safe and I wanted to introduce myself to this board and let you know that I am available to help answer any questions about the technical aspects of 2257Safe.com. Having YTracker for several years successfully keeping track of user's records, I'm really and truly excited about the fact that this can all be done online now through any web browser, using the most powerful security available, having users insured up to $2 million and finally being able to provide users the anonymity that they have wanted... all overseen by the expertise of Michael's knowledge.

If any of you have ever used Turbo Tax or something similar, you know how it basically walks you through the process of inserting information in a logical fashion. That's what we have going on here to help mitigate the chance of members missing data by jumping all around ad hoc.

A good question about spidering. At the present spidering isn't on the table but will definitely come up in future revisions. There so many variables that go into the concept of spidering that's it's nearly impossible to account for them all. If all a user's published content photos and videos all contained very specific naming conventions it would make it easier, but the problem comes in when images get cropped and collaged together and other editing. Well, those URLs where those manipulated images appear need to be accounted for as well and a spider is not capable of simply looking at a collage and recognizing that Jane Doe appears in the image blended in with 3 other people. There needs to be very specific naming conventions or meta-data conventions that the spider needs to look for in order to not miss anything and right now that is a huge challenge, not only from a programming standpoint but also it requires the cooperation of the publishers to rework their naming and meta-data conventions.

However, that is not to say that we're not going to try to find a way to make it happen because I think if we can make it work slick it could be the holy grail to fully automate URL collection.

Let me know if there's anything I can do to answer any questions.

Cheers!

[gonzo]

Thanks to both of you providing a First Look!

The last group to use Oprano for a First Look to get constructive feedback was Remote Thumbs.

I remember much of debate during that time which resulted in a groundbreaking product.

And of course the rest is history.

[tony404]

Originally Posted by pornlaw

Thanks and a great suggestion... I will ask Dan if this an option.

Michael

www.AdultBizLaw.com
www.2257Safe.com

The software new breed did and then I think they went out of biz had it.Not sure if they are still around would have to ask my wife. I know because I have it and it does it. That would be a very good tool to have, I would say a must have. The more pain you take away from people more likely they are to pay.

[kmdguy]

Hi Tony,

I would be curious as to how they went about it. The process can be done, but trick is getting a program to find every image/video related to a model without missing any... that is the key. I would be delighted to get a feature like that set up but unless we can make it 100% accurate, 99% wouldn't be acceptable. I would be interested in talking to you though about any insight you can provide as to how you think they did it.

Thanks!

[tony404]

Originally Posted by kmdguy

Hi Tony,

I would be curious as to how they went about it. The process can be done, but trick is getting a program to find every image/video related to a model without missing any... that is the key. I would be delighted to get a feature like that set up but unless we can make it 100% accurate, 99% wouldn't be acceptable. I would be interested in talking to you though about any insight you can provide as to how you think they did it.

Thanks!

I spoke to my wife she is the one that uses it. It was based on the url the way its named. Ours have the models name or production dates in the actual url. So spidering them isnt a problem. Now if they dont follow that for urls I can see that being a horror show.

[TheEnforcer]

Looks like it' gonna be one hell of a good thing for people to use....

[pornlaw]

Bump....

Michael

www.AdultBizLaw.com
www.2257Safe.com