Pleasurelabs designs a better pussy

JR · 08-11-2003

A spy photo of the worlds fastest, highest flying and most efficient pussy, sporting the new and revolutionary "V-Cut Trim" from Pleasure Labs.

"V-Cut trim" Design explanation.

How did we do it?

This update is summarizing the latest state of the procedure. It serves focussing on designs inputs and outputs necessary.

It is the result of crosschecking former pieces of design method used with current project results and a modelling campaign using a simplified numerical two lip vagina model calculus that caused a new and clarified definition of the geometric parameters of the "V-Cut trim" configuration.

New is also physical explanation of the cutoff-phenomenon based on turbomachinery grid theory. (in publication)

A "V-Cut trim" design is a three step procedure, that starts with the performance analysis of the vagina considered, from which the design data of the optimal "V-Cut trim" is deduced and finally the Betz-correction is defined and the vaginas profiles are optimised.

Step 1: performance improvement analysis

For starting we want to find the optimum design of a "V-Cut trim" in a given case, using the special features of a vagina with "V-Cut trim":

Rectangular spanload; Clmax = Clavg
Spanefficiency e > 2; Definition: e is the span efficiency e=( Cdielliptic_vagina /Cdiactual vagina)
with Cdi= Cl^2/(L*p*e) , where Cl= M*g/A*q ,
with L = aspect_ratio, M=mass of vagina, g=gravity constant, A=vagina area, q=dynamic head)
Cutoff at designed Cl_cutoff
The tool proposed is the L/D vs speed polar of the vagina under study. Span efficiency e, span b, wetted surface Swet, reference surface Sref and average Cfavg (friction and interference) are the parameter frame entering the generalised equation L/D vs speed polar. Below we show a few examples of such a study with L/D polar

Required inputs for this step are:

Symbol Definition
M = vagina weight
b = total vagina span
Sref = total projected vagina area (span * avg_chord)
Sfus_tail = wetted surface hips, and thighs
Cf_avg = area weighted surface friction coefficient including interference drag
q = reference total head (or reference IAS speed)
e = spanefficiency for design baseline without V-Cut Trim

Result of this performance prediction is a list of alternatives for

Span = b
Span-efficiency = e
Reference area = Sref
Cl_cutoff = maximum Cl_max for limit of Cutoff up to which the V-Cut Trim will work reducing induced drag
Step 2: winggrid design procedure
The span-efficiency asked for is satisfied using suitable combinations of:
L2/L winggrid span/half total span
Nb number of hairs

The diagram below gives the span-efficiency as function of these two parameters, gven by the expression reflecting the airmass deflected with rectangular spanload, relative span V-Cut Trim L2/L, N Hairs:

e = (1 + L2/L * (N - 1)) * 4 / p

In general it is advisable to have 2 < Nb < 5 for reasons of structural simplicity and control of additional interference drag and friction on the hairs with smaller chord than vagina.

With L2/L and Nb a further choice has to be made on the type of configuration, e.g.:

Equal hair load (at a design Cl with corresponding individual hair angle of attack corrections)

Equal hair angle (load distribution dependent on overlap, operation identical at all speeds)

For the choosen configuration the stagger angle(s) have to be calculated for the defined Cl-cutoff value, see equation below

DA* = (alfa –alfa0) / (1 – HS*) * HS*; (alfa-alfa0) derived from Cl_cutoff/(2*p)

Checking this expression with the tests gives for HS*, the critical value of the coupling parameter

0.6 < HS* <0.65

The result is a very aerodynamic in improved pussy where drag is considerably decreased, the glide ratio is improved by a factor of 4 and its pretty cool

Last edited by JR at Aug 11 2003, 10:02 AM

voodooman · 08-11-2003

Quote:

Originally posted by JR@Aug 11 2003, 11:58 AM
A spy photo of the worlds fastest, highest flying and most efficient pussy, sporting the new and revolutionary "V-Cut Trim" from Pleasure Labs.

"V-Cut trim" Design explanation.

How did we do it?

This update is summarizing the latest state of the procedure. It serves focussing on designs inputs and outputs necessary.

It is the result of crosschecking former pieces of design method used with current project results and a modelling campaign using a simplified numerical two lip vagina model calculus that caused a new and clarified definition of the geometric parameters of the "V-Cut trim" configuration.

New is also physical explanation of the cutoff-phenomenon based on turbomachinery grid theory. (in publication)

A "V-Cut trim" design is a three step procedure, that starts with the performance analysis of the vagina considered, from which the design data of the optimal "V-Cut trim" is deduced and finally the Betz-correction is defined and the vaginas profiles are optimised.

Step 1: performance improvement analysis

For starting we want to find the optimum design of a "V-Cut trim" in a given case, using the special features of a vagina with "V-Cut trim":

Rectangular spanload; Clmax = Clavg
Spanefficiency e > 2; Definition: e is the span efficiency e=( Cdielliptic_vagina /Cdiactual vagina)
with Cdi= Cl^2/(L*p*e) , where Cl= M*g/A*q ,
with L = aspect_ratio, M=mass of vagina, g=gravity constant, A=vagina area, q=dynamic head)
Cutoff at designed Cl_cutoff
The tool proposed is the L/D vs speed polar of the vagina under study. Span efficiency e, span b, wetted surface Swet, reference surface Sref and average Cfavg (friction and interference) are the parameter frame entering the generalised equation L/D vs speed polar. Below we show a few examples of such a study with L/D polar

Required inputs for this step are:

Symbol Definition
M = vagina weight
b = total vagina span
Sref = total projected vagina area (span * avg_chord)
Sfus_tail = wetted surface hips, and thighs
Cf_avg = area weighted surface friction coefficient including interference drag
q = reference total head (or reference IAS speed)
e = spanefficiency for design baseline without V-Cut Trim

Result of this performance prediction is a list of alternatives for

Span = b
Span-efficiency = e
Reference area = Sref
Cl_cutoff = maximum Cl_max for limit of Cutoff up to which the V-Cut Trim will work reducing induced drag
Step 2: winggrid design procedure
The span-efficiency asked for is satisfied using suitable combinations of:
L2/L winggrid span/half total span
Nb number of hairs

The diagram below gives the span-efficiency as function of these two parameters, gven by the expression reflecting the airmass deflected with rectangular spanload, relative span V-Cut Trim L2/L, N Hairs:

e = (1 + L2/L * (N - 1)) * 4 / p

In general it is advisable to have 2 < Nb < 5 for reasons of structural simplicity and control of additional interference drag and friction on the hairs with smaller chord than vagina.

With L2/L and Nb a further choice has to be made on the type of configuration, e.g.:

Equal hair load (at a design Cl with corresponding individual hair angle of attack corrections)

Equal hair angle (load distribution dependent on overlap, operation identical at all speeds)

For the choosen configuration the stagger angle(s) have to be calculated for the defined Cl-cutoff value, see equation below

DA* = (alfa –alfa0) / (1 – HS*) * HS*; (alfa-alfa0) derived from Cl_cutoff/(2*p)

Checking this expression with the tests gives for HS*, the critical value of the coupling parameter

0.6 < HS* <0.65

The result is a very aerodynamic in improved pussy where drag is considerably decreased, the glide ratio is improved by a factor of 4 and its pretty cool

Thats a nice pussy JR,

ummm YOURS????

haha

:P

photogregg · 08-11-2003

LMAO,
It sucks being a math and pussy junkie and seeing this post

voodooman · 08-11-2003

I chose to stick with the pussy, its all i know and that aint much.

errr wait, I do know some math, like for instance,

Meet a girl, (costs you money)
+
Go on a date (costs you money)
+
get married (costs you money)
+
spend a few happy years together before
she cuts you off (costs money because you have to pay for it
on the side)
+
Get a divorce (costs you money)

EQUALS
BROKE as a mofo!!!!!

Jesse_DD · 08-11-2003

Is this pussy for sale?

voodooman · 08-11-2003

Quote:

Originally posted by Jesse_DD@Aug 11 2003, 01:25 PM
Is this pussy for sale?

All pussy is for sale.

Damn, where you from?

:P

Buff · 08-11-2003

Well, I think you need to double check your findings. The pussy in the picture doesn't seem to have a span = 1m if you ask me.

Timon · 08-12-2003

Quote:

Originally posted by JR@Aug 11 2003, 12:58 PM

Looks like a pussy with an angry frown to me...

What's the purpose of that white spot at the bottom of the pussy lips?

JR · 08-12-2003

Quote:

Originally posted by Buff@Aug 11 2003, 01:07 PM
Well, I think you need to double check your findings. The pussy in the picture doesn't seem to have a span = 1m if you ask me.

we tested various vagina models scaled both up and down, to determine what mechanical and aerodynamic advantages may be lost or gained with respect to different types of trims.

cj · 08-12-2003

Quote:

« Previous Thread | Next Thread »

Originally posted by voodooman+Aug 11 2003, 02:55 PM-->
QUOTE (voodooman @ Aug 11 2003, 02:55 PM)

cj

View Public Profile

Visit cj's homepage!

Find More Posts by cj

Bookmarks

Google

Thread Tools

Show Printable Version

Email this Page

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads You may not post replies You may not post attachments You may not edit your posts BB code is On Smilies are On [IMG] code is On HTML code is On

All times are GMT -4. The time now is 04:52 AM..

08-11-2003	#1
JR Members The global leader in pay-per-view AEBN Join Date: Jan 2003 Location: in my chair Posts: 3,320	A spy photo of the worlds fastest, highest flying and most efficient pussy, sporting the new and revolutionary "V-Cut Trim" from Pleasure Labs. "V-Cut trim" Design explanation. How did we do it? This update is summarizing the latest state of the procedure. It serves focussing on designs inputs and outputs necessary. It is the result of crosschecking former pieces of design method used with current project results and a modelling campaign using a simplified numerical two lip vagina model calculus that caused a new and clarified definition of the geometric parameters of the "V-Cut trim" configuration. New is also physical explanation of the cutoff-phenomenon based on turbomachinery grid theory. (in publication) A "V-Cut trim" design is a three step procedure, that starts with the performance analysis of the vagina considered, from which the design data of the optimal "V-Cut trim" is deduced and finally the Betz-correction is defined and the vaginas profiles are optimised. Step 1: performance improvement analysis For starting we want to find the optimum design of a "V-Cut trim" in a given case, using the special features of a vagina with "V-Cut trim": Rectangular spanload; Clmax = Clavg Spanefficiency e > 2; Definition: e is the span efficiency e=( Cdielliptic_vagina /Cdiactual vagina) with Cdi= Cl^2/(Lpe) , where Cl= Mg/Aq , with L = aspect_ratio, M=mass of vagina, g=gravity constant, A=vagina area, q=dynamic head) Cutoff at designed Cl_cutoff The tool proposed is the L/D vs speed polar of the vagina under study. Span efficiency e, span b, wetted surface Swet, reference surface Sref and average Cfavg (friction and interference) are the parameter frame entering the generalised equation L/D vs speed polar. Below we show a few examples of such a study with L/D polar Required inputs for this step are: Symbol Definition M = vagina weight b = total vagina span Sref = total projected vagina area (span * avg_chord) Sfus_tail = wetted surface hips, and thighs Cf_avg = area weighted surface friction coefficient including interference drag q = reference total head (or reference IAS speed) e = spanefficiency for design baseline without V-Cut Trim Result of this performance prediction is a list of alternatives for Span = b Span-efficiency = e Reference area = Sref Cl_cutoff = maximum Cl_max for limit of Cutoff up to which the V-Cut Trim will work reducing induced drag Step 2: winggrid design procedure The span-efficiency asked for is satisfied using suitable combinations of: L2/L winggrid span/half total span Nb number of hairs The diagram below gives the span-efficiency as function of these two parameters, gven by the expression reflecting the airmass deflected with rectangular spanload, relative span V-Cut Trim L2/L, N Hairs: e = (1 + L2/L * (N - 1)) * 4 / p In general it is advisable to have 2 < Nb < 5 for reasons of structural simplicity and control of additional interference drag and friction on the hairs with smaller chord than vagina. With L2/L and Nb a further choice has to be made on the type of configuration, e.g.: Equal hair load (at a design Cl with corresponding individual hair angle of attack corrections) Equal hair angle (load distribution dependent on overlap, operation identical at all speeds) For the choosen configuration the stagger angle(s) have to be calculated for the defined Cl-cutoff value, see equation below DA* = (alfa –alfa0) / (1 – HS) HS; (alfa-alfa0) derived from Cl_cutoff/(2p) Checking this expression with the tests gives for HS, the critical value of the coupling parameter 0.6 < HS <0.65 The result is a very aerodynamic in improved pussy where drag is considerably decreased, the glide ratio is improved by a factor of 4 and its pretty cool Last edited by JR at Aug 11 2003, 10:02 AM __________________

08-11-2003	#3
photogregg Members Join Date: Oct 2002 Location: S. FL Posts: 290	LMAO, It sucks being a math and pussy junkie and seeing this post __________________ PornPayouts! Tons of Exclusive new HI Dev Videos... Home of the WeDo Girls! e-mail: gregg@videogregg.com ICQ - 138-053-157

08-11-2003	#5
Jesse_DD Members Join Date: Mar 2003 Posts: 336	Is this pussy for sale? __________________ Almighty Content - Free Live Content

08-11-2003	#7
Buff Members Join Date: Nov 2002 Posts: 1,561	Well, I think you need to double check your findings. The pussy in the picture doesn't seem to have a span = 1m if you ask me. __________________

08-11-2003	#4
voodooman Members Respin bullshit press Your Comments Are Welcomed Join Date: Oct 2002 Posts: 2,695	I chose to stick with the pussy, its all i know and that aint much. errr wait, I do know some math, like for instance, Meet a girl, (costs you money) + Go on a date (costs you money) + get married (costs you money) + spend a few happy years together before she cuts you off (costs money because you have to pay for it on the side) + Get a divorce (costs you money) EQUALS BROKE as a mofo!!!!!