Quote:
Originally Posted by FSC Diane
First, Emporer EJ, I am sorry to hear that FSC failed to provide you with satisfactory customer service. We are a service provider to our members and member service is an utmost priority to me and my staff. I don’t know when FSC fell short but I would like to follow-up with you to find out the details to make sure that this kind of error does not happen again. If you would be so kind as to contact me at diane@freespeechcoalition.com I would love to arrange a time for us to talk. I appreciate the insight that you share about our industry and FSC and I know I would enjoy further conversation. |
I appreciate you responding here. And I'll talk with you then. But is was something more than "customer service."
There's no point flaming the FSC on the board, but I feel a bit like Gonzo's response.
You kinda lost me along the way......(for different reasons)
At the expense of sounding Not politically correct, I don't care about chasing kiddie porn people.
It's a horrible thing, and those people are evil and all ought to be hung up by their balls. But we pay for an FBI, let them chase 'em. I'm not paying twice to do it.
The FSC should be about one thing: (Primarily) Protecting Free Speech.
Not local issues in California, except as they affect the rest of the country.
And if you don't have a lobbyist in Washington, you're simply chasing your tail. You are RE-acting to things happening to the industry. We need to be PRO-active. That's how Government works. By the time it gets to "enforcement," the big wheel of government is already rolling. It's 100X easier to stop it's momentum BEFORE it gets rolling.
That's the basis of my argument.
I really believe it's a west coast/east coast way of thinking.