View Single Post
Old 06-19-2009   #17
miz_wright
Head CheeseMonger
 
miz_wright's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Posts: 1,069
Default Re: AIM Irresponsible? AIDS Rampant in Calif?

Quote:
Originally Posted by rhetorical View Post
Personally, I think in the real world, if you are fucking "real" heterosexual people you meet in "real" life...far far away from porn, strippers, etc. You are probably pretty safe. Those stats are really low.
I mostly stay away from productions that have real safety issues. The boys are usually boyfriends of the girls but mostly I do girl girl and single girl stuff.
Outside of that it is condoms. But most of the people I work with, I know and trust. It is the trust that is the biggest problem in the porn business. Honesty is no a commodity with a lot of currency in this game.

And I hate shooting boy girl stuff. Its time consuming, expensive and boring as stink.
I think I would disagree with the idea that away from porn and what not your risk levels drop. I mean, we have more than 22 cases of HIV/ AIDS in the country right now, which means that the majority of the transmission is happening outside. In that "real world" you speak of. Where stats are "low."

Actually, though, when I review the CDC's information out there for the last compiled year (2007*), new infection rates are about 16% of population in both white and black males and between 3 and 8% for white and black females. Scarier? Roughly 14% of the male populations between the ages of 14-29 are newly infected.

I think it's safe to say that I'd rather fuck a porn star.


* Source: CDC, Table 3, "Cases of HIV Infection and AIDS in the United States and Dependent Areas, 2007"
__________________
Sales Babe and General Nerd

Be different; get it Wright
Wright Stuff Consulting

Hit me on ICQ at 353902844 or email me at liz (at) wrightstuffconsulting (dot) com
miz_wright is offline   Reply With Quote