Quote:
Originally Posted by rhetorical
your penis, actually
|
No, I meant to say "Balls."
I was going for the literary effect there. That is, for the reader to imagine the "government" actually "grabbing" one's delicate "balls." As any real man knows, the balls, being a delicate organ, subject to swift discomfort at the lightest assault.
Now the Penis can "take a beating," (See what I did there, with the little Pun?) and some men might find that enjoyable.
But, if you want to be a Dick about it, (See there, another little pun?) My statement still makes more sense.
Since concern here is the contraction of AIDS from sexual intimacy, the balls would make it more risky. Casual contact with the skin, even the skin of the penis, has a lower incidence of infection than the exchange of seminal fluid/mucus membrane. No balls, no seminal fluid.
MORE difficult for you, the Aids infected, "ball-less" man, (Or balls controlled by the government) to transmit the disease to vulnerable mucus membrane/vaginal membrane/anal lining, without said, seminal fluid.
But, as I said, I wasn't going for technical detail. I was going for a graphic literary effect.
